24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4569)
>文献求助 (306)
>导师招生 (268)
>论文投稿 (255)
>博后之家 (239)
>虫友互识 (163)
>硕博家园 (91)
>考博 (81)
>有机交流 (81)
>招聘信息布告栏 (63)
>学术会议 (47)
>休闲灌水 (31)
>基金申请 (26)
>教师之家 (22)
>找工作 (21)
>考研 (18)

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者jolil将赠送您 5 个金币

jolil

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 34.6
帖子: 32
在线: 37小时
虫号: 1660809
注册: 2012-03-03
性别: GG
专业: 食品科学

[求助] 求助回复意见已有1人参与

One major issue I have with this paper is why the authors used the Duncan's multiple range test for statistical analysis. This statistical method is particularly prone to type I errors. I suggest re-doing the analysis with a more conservative analysis like ANOVA followed by a simple student t-test or another method. Probably related to this, many of the figures have differences between groups that don't look significantly different to me. For example, in Figure 1B are G vs P groups really different? In Figure 5, are NG vs P or P vs MG really different? There are many more examples, but I would like to know what the interpretation is like with a more conservative statistical analysis. I'm not a statistician so I wouldn't reject the paper even if another analysis comes to a different conclusion, but at the minimum the authors should perform the analysis with another method and mention the differences (if any) that occur.

这个审稿人提出用ANOVA followed by a simple student t-test 这个统计方法，请问有这种方法吗？可是我是多组两两比较，能用t-test吗

回复此楼