| ²é¿´: 467 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
ľ×ÓÄÉÀ¼Ä¾³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
¹ØÓÚEPRµÄÎÊÌâ
|
¸÷λ´óÉñÃÇ£¬ÄãÃǺã¬ÏëÎÊÒ»ÏÂÄÄλÁ˽âEPR²âÊÔÖÐÊý¾Ý³öÏÖµÄÎÊÌâÄØ£¿ µ¼Ê¦¸Õ¸ÕͶµÝÁËһƪÎÄÕ£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬¿ÉÊÇÔÚEPR²âÊÔÊý¾ÝÕâÀïÌá³öÁ˺ü¸¸öÎÊÌ⣬¾À½áÁË£¬²»Ã÷°×ÈçºÎ´¦ÀíÎÊÌâÈçÏ£º 1. About EPR spectra. A weak and broad EPR signal (g =2.12) may be attributed to generation of NH radicals and synergetic effect of copper ions, which seems to be incorrect. Firstly, EPR signal for radicals were always around g = 2.00 with small linewidth (about 20 Gauss). Secondly, radicals may be generated in N atoms of pyridine, such as viologen redical (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3249 ¨C3251). Thirdly, no evidence for appearance of mixed copper valence of 1P was found. Fourthly, whether impurities or vacancy factor lead to unusual EPR signal. ÓÈÆäÊǵÚËĸö£¬£¬Ï£Íû´ó¼ÒÁ˽âµÄ£¬»áµÄ£¬£¬°ïÖúСŮ×ÓÒ»ÏÂ×Ó£¬²»Ê¤¸Ð¼¤Ñ½ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ-²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³ÌѧԺ-½ªÎ°½ÜÇàÍŶÓ-ÕÐÉúÎï·½Ïòµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ-²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³ÌѧԺ-ÕÐ ÉúÎï·½Ïò ˶ʿ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Óлú¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ149È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ-²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³ÌѧԺ-½ªÎ°½ÜÇàÍŶÓ-ÕÐÉúÎï·½Ïòµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
[Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ]²ÄÁÏѧԺ[½ªÎ°ÍŶÓÃû³Æ]¿ÎÌâ×é-2026Äê˶ʿÑо¿Éúµ÷¼ÁÐÅÏ¢
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ-²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³ÌѧԺ-½ªÎ°½ÜÇàÍŶÓ-Õе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïҽѧ²ÄÁÏÇ°ÑØ¿ÆÆÕ£ºµÍÃܶȡ¢¸ß¿×϶Âʵġ°¶à¿×΢Çò¡±ºËÐļ¼ÊõÓëÓ¦ÓÃÈ«¾°
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ºþÄϹ¤Òµ´óѧÖܹóÒú×éÕÐÉúÎïҽѧ¹¤³Ì£¨Ñ§Ë¶07¡¢08¶¼ÐУ©¡¢ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©£¨×¨Ë¶08£©Ë¶Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ºþÄϹ¤Òµ´óѧÖܹóÒú×éÕÐÉúÎïҽѧ¹¤³Ì£¨Ñ§Ë¶07¡¢08¶¼ÐУ©ºÍÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©£¨×¨Ë¶08£©Ë¶Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
¿¼ÑÐÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
2026ÄêÖÐÄÏÃñ×å´óѧ»¯Ñ§Óë²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ñ§Ôºµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´















¸÷λ´óÉñÃÇ£¬ÄãÃǺã¬ÏëÎÊÒ»ÏÂÄÄλÁ˽âEPR²âÊÔÖÐÊý¾Ý³öÏÖµÄÎÊÌâÄØ£¿
µ¼Ê¦¸Õ¸ÕͶµÝÁËһƪÎÄÕ£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬¿ÉÊÇÔÚEPR²âÊÔÊý¾ÝÕâÀïÌá³öÁ˺ü¸¸öÎÊÌ⣬¾À½áÁË£¬²»Ã÷°×ÈçºÎ´¦Àí
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥