24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4223  |  回复: 24

liu0807

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 以下是主编给我的回复,状态是reject&resubmit 已有17人参与

In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s), I must decline the manuscript for publication at this time.  However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments.

Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered.

You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript.  Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.

Once you have revised your manuscript, go to  login to your Author Center.  Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number.  Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the Journal,your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.

I look forward to a resubmission.

这是主编给我的回复,之下是审稿人的意见:
The authors' effort at addressing some of the issues the reviewers raised is appreciated. However, the key criticism that the submission rather shallow TEM work is not satisfactorily addressed.

In my opinion the paper deals with an interesting topic related to microalloyed steels, whether in scientific or technological terms. However, I think that TEM was utilized in a very limited way and it did not contribute to support microstructural models developed in the manuscript. Because of this, only a qualitative discussion could be presented. The authors should conduct a more comprehensive and in-depth study of the microstructure using TEM. In their response, the authors wrote that they were working on more details in the mechanism of precipitation and its interaction with austenite grain size using TEM.

I suggest that the authors wait until they complete the above ongoing work to publish their results. Without a more in-depth and rigorous experimental work, the submission shall not have much value. I recommend a reject with an option to resubmit a new version that includes a much more in-depth TEM analysis of the precipitation behavior.

Should you decide to submit a new version, you must highlight all changes you make to your submission in response to the above comments. Additionally, you must provide a letter explaining in depth how you addressed the comments. Your response and revision will be re-evaluated.

Thank you!


之前一审的结果是 Major revision,这次是不是就没有什么希望了,是杯具一枚啊。
我第一次发文章,经验不足,希望大虾们多多指点啊。
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

liu0807

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by liouzhan654 at 2016-05-12 11:22:12
既然是拒稿重投,那就按照审稿人的意见好好修改后,重投吧

恩,可是我不确定的是,为什么第一次给的是Major revision,而这次是reject,是不是就是拒绝的了啊。就是说我即使再投也是一样被拒的。也不知道要不要先回复一下主编或者审稿人。
4楼2016-05-12 12:14:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liu0807

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by SARDemo at 2016-05-12 12:55:19
之前大修没有回答关键问题啊……估计审稿人不开心了 好好改重投应该没问题

要补实验,真的好痛苦啊!!
那我要不要先邮件回复下主编或者审稿人呢。
6楼2016-05-12 13:18:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiarenxu

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
我觉得主编还是对你的文章感兴趣,不然不会给你重投的机会。因为大修过一次,论文时间比较长了,重投为了以后在发表论文里面把接收时间变短。楼主还是好好按照审稿人的意见修改,找个高手把respond letter写好。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
8楼2016-05-12 14:02:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

TomFakir

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

小木虫


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
好好修改,重投接受的几率很大,曾经我有篇就是重投,后来接受了

发自小木虫Android客户端
Toknoweverythingistoknownothing
23楼2016-05-15 09:03:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

liu0807

新虫 (初入文坛)

哎,真的是很伤心哎,没有人在吗
2楼2016-05-12 11:09:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liouzhan654

版主 (知名作家)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
既然是拒稿重投,那就按照审稿人的意见好好修改后,重投吧
思想是人类心灵的灯塔,指引着社会前进的方向。
3楼2016-05-12 11:22:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

SARDemo

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
之前大修没有回答关键问题啊……估计审稿人不开心了 好好改重投应该没问题

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2016-05-12 12:55:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zbconquer

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这个reviewer语气看上去很诚恳啊
“I suggest that the authors wait until they complete the above ongoing work to publish their results. Without a more in-depth and rigorous experimental work, the submission shall not have much value. ”
7楼2016-05-12 13:40:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liouzhan654

版主 (知名作家)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by liu0807 at 2016-05-12 12:14:19
恩,可是我不确定的是,为什么第一次给的是Major revision,而这次是reject,是不是就是拒绝的了啊。就是说我即使再投也是一样被拒的。也不知道要不要先回复一下主编或者审稿人。...

恩恩,可以把审稿人的问题回复一下,然后在coverletter中说明是修改后重投的
思想是人类心灵的灯塔,指引着社会前进的方向。
9楼2016-05-12 14:07:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

SARDemo

新虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by liu0807 at 2016-05-12 13:18:29
要补实验,真的好痛苦啊!!
那我要不要先邮件回复下主编或者审稿人呢。...

这个没办法 审稿人认准了这点了 我觉得你要是不打算该这个估计还是没戏 尽力补充一下吧

发自小木虫Android客户端
10楼2016-05-12 14:16:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 liu0807 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见