| ²é¿´: 1762 | »Ø¸´: 9 | |||
| ¡¾Óн±½»Á÷¡¿»ý¼«»Ø¸´±¾Ìû×Ó£¬²ÎÓë½»Á÷£¬¾ÍÓлú»á·ÖµÃ×÷Õß syp719 µÄ 9 ¸ö½ð±Ò | |||
syp719ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
Éó¸åºóÖ÷±àÒâ¼ûÊÇReject & Resubmit £¬Ë°ïÎÒ¿´¿´ÕâÒâ¼ûÐ޸ĺóÓбØÒªÖØÍ¶Âð
|
||
|
EIC scores: REWRITE AND RE-SUBMIT Page 1 Line 44: 10 quotes collected cultivars, but names only 9. If we compare with the cultivars described in Table 1, is missing Zha71. page 2 Lines 12 and 13: external standard for a method by gas chromatography is not recommended, because the error is too large. It is preferred internal standardization. Furthermore, no mention reference method of analysis and it was not validated. I could have used a recognized compendial method, as it did in the following paragraph, using methods of AOAC. So, author must focus in the results and claims for its validity. Lines 41 and 42: also does not talk if the methods by ICP-AES have been validated. page 3 - same as prior comment. Lines 12 and 13: "The results of this study are in agreement with previous studies que have shown the kernel percentage of Chinese walnut cultivars to be between 51% and 70%": then why do the research if it has been researched and proven this percentage in previous studies? You must indicate WHY it is important, not just state it. Table 1: alphabetize. As Hartley cultivar is used for comparison, it should be highlighted Table 2: badly formatted, making it difficult to read and interpret the results. Table 3: idem Table 2 Table 4: idem table 1 Abstract: do not talk at any time what the purpose of comparing the nuts with a nut Chinese American Hartley. I think You should mention the importance to health of these high nutritional indices of Chinese nuts when compared to the American nut. The abstract presents many results but without showing the relevance of them. Entire Scoresheet: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Accept Comments: (There are no comments.) Additional Questions: Does the manuscript contain new and significant information to justify publication?: Yes Does the Abstract (Summary) clearly and accurately describe the content of the article?: Yes Is the problem significant and concisely stated?: Yes Are the methods described comprehensively?: Yes Are the interpretations and conclusions justified by the results?: Yes Is adequate reference made to other work in the field?: Yes Length of article is: Adequate Number of tables is: Adequate Number of figures is: Adequate Please state any conflict(s) of interest that you have in relation to the review of this paper (state ¡°none¡± if this is not applicable).: no Rating: Interest: 2. Good Quality: 2. Good Originality: 3. Average Overall: 2. Good Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject Comments: (There are no comments.) Additional Questions: Does the manuscript contain new and significant information to justify publication?: No Does the Abstract (Summary) clearly and accurately describe the content of the article?: No Is the problem significant and concisely stated?: No Are the methods described comprehensively?: Yes Are the interpretations and conclusions justified by the results?: Yes Is adequate reference made to other work in the field?: Yes Length of article is: Adequate Number of tables is: Too many Number of figures is: Too few Please state any conflict(s) of interest that you have in relation to the review of this paper (state ¡°none¡± if this is not applicable).: none Rating: Interest: 3. Average Quality: 3. Average Originality: 3. Average Overall: 3. Average |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0703µ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧ319·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬0703»¯Ñ§305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»úеר˶274Çóµ÷¼Á£¬²»ÌôרҵѧУ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
284Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±½»´ó²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì×Ü·Ö358Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÄϿƴóÉúÎïѧ297·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
SCIͶ¸å¹ý³Ì×ܽᡢͶ¸å״̬½âÎö¡¢¾Ü¸åºó¶Ô²ß¼°½ÓÊܺóÆÚÏà¹ØÎÊ´ð
ÒѾÓÐ142È˻ظ´
SCIͶ¸å¹ý³Ì×ܽá
ÒѾÓÐ124È˻ظ´

ÄäÃû
Óû§×¢Ïú (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2558
- É¢½ð: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 253
- ÔÚÏß: 94Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 0
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-21
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÉúÎï´ó·Ö×ӽṹÓ빦ÄÜ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
syp719: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-05-11 17:03:20
syp719: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-05-11 17:05:09
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
syp719: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-05-11 17:03:20
syp719: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-05-11 17:05:09
2Â¥2016-05-11 16:07:26
zhaobaikejia
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 9377.6
- É¢½ð: 1815
- ºì»¨: 13
- Ìû×Ó: 2091
- ÔÚÏß: 438.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3065513
- ×¢²á: 2014-03-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Óлú·Ö×Ó¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ»¯Ñ§
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
syp719: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-05-11 17:03:05
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
syp719: ½ð±Ò+2 2016-05-11 17:03:05
|
ÈÏÕæÐ޸ģ¬Â¼È¡µÄ»úÂÊ»¹ÊÇͦ´óµÄ ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |

3Â¥2016-05-11 16:13:10
4Â¥2016-05-11 16:15:20
jjfengnju
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3535.3
- É¢½ð: 2354
- ºì»¨: 23
- Ìû×Ó: 994
- ÔÚÏß: 1827.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 683572
- ×¢²á: 2008-12-28
- רҵ: ÉúÎïÎïÀí»¯Ñ§
5Â¥2016-05-11 16:20:22
xzl_0633
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1904.7
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 2219
- ÔÚÏß: 43.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3842556
- ×¢²á: 2015-04-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ΢ÉúÎïÉúÀíÓëÉúÎﻯѧ

6Â¥2016-05-11 16:22:09
ieem
ľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
www.ieem.org
- Ó¦Öú: 160 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3801.7
- É¢½ð: 2249
- ºì»¨: 13
- Ìû×Ó: 10852
- ÔÚÏß: 239.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 689019
- ×¢²á: 2009-01-07
- רҵ: ¹¤Òµ¹¤³ÌÓë¹ÜÀí
7Â¥2016-05-11 16:30:25
|
8Â¥2016-05-11 16:32:18
syp719
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3277.5
- É¢½ð: 736
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 615
- ÔÚÏß: 182.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1110236
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-28
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ¾¼ÃÁÖѧ

9Â¥2016-05-11 17:02:49
syp719
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3277.5
- É¢½ð: 736
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 615
- ÔÚÏß: 182.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1110236
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-28
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ¾¼ÃÁÖѧ

10Â¥2016-05-11 17:04:53














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
5