| 查看: 1116 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者leao0920将赠送您 45 个金币 | ||
[求助]
Submissions Needing Revision中给出下列意见，但是不太明白！求大神指点！ 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Thank you for your manuscript. It will require significant revision before I can proceed with further consideration for peer review. From an editorial perspective, the use of English grammar requires revision and improvement throughout the entire manuscript. References must also be cited in the text in the required journal format. The pressure unit to report for dust explosion results is bar(g). The main difficulty at this point is that there appears to be no original research contribution to the archival literature on dust explosions. All of the phenomena you describe (e.g., the variation of explosion pressure with dust concentration, the influence of particle size, etc.) are all well-known and well-established. There would be no reason to expect any other behavior of the tested sample. Explosion results for rubber dust are also widely available. So in conclusion, the original research contribution would have to be explicitly described in the manuscript. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2026年国自然面上资助率
已经有9人回复
-
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有18人回复
-
基础研究怎么拉横向，学校到款任务越来越多，难以完成 拉横向，都有哪些途径啊
已经有8人回复
-
HXDI做水性聚氨酯乳液，是不是特别容易出渣
已经有3人回复
-
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有19人回复
-
系统今天又提示维护了，估计离放榜不远了
已经有15人回复
-
申请2027年材料/化学类博士
已经有5人回复
-
你们的时间戳变了吗
已经有4人回复
-
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有9人回复
-
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有5人回复
2楼2016-05-05 19:32:38
leao09203楼2016-05-05 20:38:12
4楼2016-05-05 22:55:21