| 查看: 1205 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者leao0920将赠送您 45 个金币 | ||
[求助]
Submissions Needing Revision中给出下列意见，但是不太明白！求大神指点！ 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Thank you for your manuscript. It will require significant revision before I can proceed with further consideration for peer review. From an editorial perspective, the use of English grammar requires revision and improvement throughout the entire manuscript. References must also be cited in the text in the required journal format. The pressure unit to report for dust explosion results is bar(g). The main difficulty at this point is that there appears to be no original research contribution to the archival literature on dust explosions. All of the phenomena you describe (e.g., the variation of explosion pressure with dust concentration, the influence of particle size, etc.) are all well-known and well-established. There would be no reason to expect any other behavior of the tested sample. Explosion results for rubber dust are also widely available. So in conclusion, the original research contribution would have to be explicitly described in the manuscript. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
【长期招聘】复旦大学 AI 制药实验室 博士后招聘
已经有11人回复
-
2027博士申请-临床检验诊断学、病原生物学、微生物方向
已经有5人回复
-
各位基础老师们，看完中央《从严治党》的决定后，对学术界更加有信心了吧
已经有4人回复
2楼2016-05-05 19:32:38
leao09203楼2016-05-05 20:38:12
4楼2016-05-05 22:55:21