| ²é¿´: 1153 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õßleao0920½«ÔùËÍÄú 45 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
[ÇóÖú]
Submissions Needing RevisionÖиø³öÏÂÁÐÒâ¼û£¬µ«ÊDz»Ì«Ã÷°×£¡Çó´óÉñÖ¸µã£¡ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
Thank you for your manuscript. It will require significant revision before I can proceed with further consideration for peer review. From an editorial perspective, the use of English grammar requires revision and improvement throughout the entire manuscript. References must also be cited in the text in the required journal format. The pressure unit to report for dust explosion results is bar(g). The main difficulty at this point is that there appears to be no original research contribution to the archival literature on dust explosions. All of the phenomena you describe (e.g., the variation of explosion pressure with dust concentration, the influence of particle size, etc.) are all well-known and well-established. There would be no reason to expect any other behavior of the tested sample. Explosion results for rubber dust are also widely available. So in conclusion, the original research contribution would have to be explicitly described in the manuscript. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.551.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.55.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»ù½ð²»ÖУ¬¹²Ãã
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¿´°åÉÏÕâô¶àÖеģ¬ÓеãÏñ50ÈËȺÀï49¸öÈ˶¼ÊÇÆ×ÓµÄÄÇÖָоõ¡¡
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÎÒ²»Àí½â£¡
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
2026ÄêµÄ¹ú¼ÒÉç¿Æ»ù½ðÏîĿͨѶÆÀÉóµÄйæÔòÓëж¯Ïò¡¢ÐÂÌôÕ½
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ϵͳ²é²»µ½
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Ôõô²é°¡
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
2Â¥2016-05-05 19:32:38
ÄäÃû
Óû§×¢Ïú (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 8 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 242.9
- É¢½ð: 1920
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 235
- ÔÚÏß: 99Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 0
- ×¢²á: 2011-09-15
- רҵ: Á÷ÌåÁ¦Ñ§
3Â¥2016-05-05 20:38:12
4Â¥2016-05-05 22:55:21









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
leao0920