| 查看: 985 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者leao0920将赠送您 45 个金币 | ||
[求助]
Submissions Needing Revision中给出下列意见，但是不太明白！求大神指点！ 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Thank you for your manuscript. It will require significant revision before I can proceed with further consideration for peer review. From an editorial perspective, the use of English grammar requires revision and improvement throughout the entire manuscript. References must also be cited in the text in the required journal format. The pressure unit to report for dust explosion results is bar(g). The main difficulty at this point is that there appears to be no original research contribution to the archival literature on dust explosions. All of the phenomena you describe (e.g., the variation of explosion pressure with dust concentration, the influence of particle size, etc.) are all well-known and well-established. There would be no reason to expect any other behavior of the tested sample. Explosion results for rubber dust are also widely available. So in conclusion, the original research contribution would have to be explicitly described in the manuscript. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有11人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有9人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有10人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
2楼2016-05-05 19:32:38
leao09203楼2016-05-05 20:38:12
4楼2016-05-05 22:55:21