| 查看: 962 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者leao0920将赠送您 45 个金币 | ||
[求助]
Submissions Needing Revision中给出下列意见，但是不太明白！求大神指点！ 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Thank you for your manuscript. It will require significant revision before I can proceed with further consideration for peer review. From an editorial perspective, the use of English grammar requires revision and improvement throughout the entire manuscript. References must also be cited in the text in the required journal format. The pressure unit to report for dust explosion results is bar(g). The main difficulty at this point is that there appears to be no original research contribution to the archival literature on dust explosions. All of the phenomena you describe (e.g., the variation of explosion pressure with dust concentration, the influence of particle size, etc.) are all well-known and well-established. There would be no reason to expect any other behavior of the tested sample. Explosion results for rubber dust are also widely available. So in conclusion, the original research contribution would have to be explicitly described in the manuscript. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有7人回复
-
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
2楼2016-05-05 19:32:38
leao09203楼2016-05-05 20:38:12
4楼2016-05-05 22:55:21