应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 论文写作 » renewable energy 投稿
121/2返回列表12下一页
查看: 1782  |  回复: 11
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前主题已经存档。

zyugiec

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] renewable energy 投稿

本人给renewable energy 有近20天了，还没收稿，还是Submitted to Journal状态。
请问各位虫友，这正常吗？？

有没有投过该杂志的虫友啊
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
1楼 2008-10-28 17:05:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zyugiec

金虫 (正式写手)
而且给发了两次邮件询问，都杳无音讯
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2008-10-28 17:08:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

五行之水

银虫 (小有名气)
和楼主有同样的遭遇
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2008-10-29 07:42:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wyraul

银虫 (正式写手)
这个期刊奇慢无比，你有的时间要耗了。
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2008-10-29 12:51:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zyugiec

金虫 (正式写手)
那我撤稿算了
回复此楼
5楼2008-10-29 15:42:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zyugiec

金虫 (正式写手)
已经投了27天了，还是没收稿，邮件也发了两三次，都杳无音讯
难道真的要撤稿嘛
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2008-11-07 18:06:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

与子偕老1068

铜虫 (小有名气)
楼主，对自己负责点，撤稿吧！天下何处无“芳草”！
赞一下 回复此楼
行为决定习惯， 习惯造就性格， 性格主宰命运。
7楼2008-11-08 08:43:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yw__577

金虫 (文坛精英)
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
现在在等这个期刊的proof了，说三个月内给proof
08年底投的，稿件号等了快两个月才给我，估计是圣诞和新年的关系？只能这么安慰自己了
审稿l三个月，revision一个月，折腾加起来前后耗了快8个月
幸好才博一，有点时间跟他耗
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
8楼2009-08-21 17:25:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huajunwang882

木虫 (小有名气)

伙计
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
这个期刊比较慢的，分配稿号一般要1－2个月左右以后。如果是Technical note, 审稿会快一些，3－6个月；如果是正常的Research Paper，审稿可能会更慢一些。但最终取决于稿件质量。杂志主编：A.A.M. Sayigh，非常认真的一个人，审稿人一般都是各子领域的大牛，所以回复时间要长一些。最好不要随便撤稿，除非有极其特殊原因。
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
努力的伙计
9楼2009-08-21 17:46:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhongnanliuhui

木虫 (著名写手)

小木虫
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
我投过 半年左右审稿回来

Dear Mr. 5555,

The Editorial Board of Renewable Energy receives many excellent papers for publication, but since we have a limited number of pages available in each issue, it is not possible to publish all the papers submitted.

I regret to inform you that following review your paper has not been recommended  for publication in Renewable Energy in its present form.  However, you are invited to resubmit the paper for re-review  when you have addressed the issues raised by the reviewer detailed below.

We thank you for your interest in Renewable Energy and look forward to receiving your revised paper.


Yours sincerely,

Editor-in-Chief
Renewable Energy

Review comments:


The authors' Improved Time Series Analysis Method [ITSAM] seems to be new and worth consideration, although only time will tell whether it can achieve wide-spread use.  However the paper needs considerable revision to make it suitable for publication.

Most immediately striking are the faults in vocabulary and grammar [like '1th' instead of '1st', 'High' instead of 'Highly', frequent omission of 'the', 'Maintain' instead of 'Retain' or 'Keep', etc, etc].  In principle, it should still be possible to follow the text even with these faults but the complexity of the arguments makes it almost impossible to persevere in the face of such repeated difficulties over language.  

One minor bit of bad luck is the way the authors' computer treats (1), (2) and (3), putting them in circles. Many computers give a problem with (a), (b) and © but this can no doubt be taken care of with suitable editing.

The reader is expected to compare the results shown in Figures 8 to 16. Unfortunately, little indication is given in the text and none in the figures themselves what differences the reader should be looking for.  This makes them completely useless.  One or two of the Figures might perhaps be retained to show what is going on but all the rest should be omitted and then a way must  be found of extracting and expressing concisely [and preferably quantitatively] the key differences that need to be brought out to prove the point[s] that the authors are trying to make.  

The authors address the issue of wind speed forecasting but what is actually needed is wind power forecasting. A 9.44% error in wind speed does not sound too serious but a 31% error in wind power does. The mean of the cubes of a time-series is not the same as the cube of  the mean  so this is not a simple issue but something should be said, even if it only to recognise that the authors do not cover this discrepancy in their analysis.  [If they are able to do so, that would, of course, be a very welcome addition to their paper.]
不知道算不算据稿还是有希望接受？
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
有情义有担当，无依无傍我自强，这一身傲骨敲起来铮铮的响！
10楼2009-08-26 18:02:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zyugiec 的主题更新
121/2返回列表12下一页
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 0856材料求调剂 +10 hyf hyf hyf 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-02-28 18:50 by 无际的草原
[考研] 298求调剂 +6 人间唯你是清欢 2026-02-28 7/350 2026-02-28 18:48 by 无际的草原
[考研] 材料学调剂 +4 提神豆沙包 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-02-28 18:26 by houyaoxu
[考研] 高分子化学与物理调剂 +4 好好好1233 2026-02-28 5/250 2026-02-28 18:20 by liqiongjy
[教师之家] 版面费该交吗 +15 苹果在哪里 2026-02-22 18/900 2026-02-28 18:20 by mibaomingg
[考研] 材料类求调剂 +4 wana_kiko 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-02-28 18:08 by djennjx
[考研] 材料调剂 +3 爱擦汗的可乐冰 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-02-28 18:06 by houyaoxu
[考研] 276求调剂 +3 路lyh123 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-02-28 18:02 by houyaoxu
[考博] 博士自荐 +3 kkluvs 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-02-28 16:59 by StarAura
[考博] 博士推荐 +4 花儿笑? 2026-02-21 5/250 2026-02-28 16:55 by mumin1990
[考研] 265分求调剂不调专业和学校有行学上就 +4 礼堂丁真258 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-02-28 16:18 by 求调剂zz
[考研] 295求调剂 +4 19171856320 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-02-28 13:39 by ms629
[考研] 0856调剂 +3 刘梦微 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-02-28 13:22 by houyaoxu
[考研] 寻找调剂 +3 LYidhsjabdj 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-02-28 12:59 by miniwendy
[考研] 304求调剂 +5 曼殊2266 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-02-28 12:44 by 迷糊CCPs
[硕博家园] 博士自荐 +6 科研狗111 2026-02-26 9/450 2026-02-28 12:32 by seaskyy
[考研] 272求调剂 +3 田智友 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-02-28 12:31 by 王加浩to
[考研] 298求调剂 +4 axyz3 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-02-28 11:21 by wang_dand
[基金申请] 面上可以超过30页吧？ +12 阿拉贡aragon 2026-02-22 13/650 2026-02-26 22:09 by Hahaxia
[硕博家园] 【博士招生】太原理工大学2026化工博士 +4 N1ce_try 2026-02-24 8/400 2026-02-26 08:40 by N1ce_try
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭