| ²é¿´: 3819 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||||
Ó©»ðÖ®É1992гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
LAMMPSζÈ×èÄáϵÊýÓ°ÏìÈȵ¼ÂÊ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
| ÎÒÓÃLAMMPS×Ô´øµÄÀý×ÓÎļþ¼ÐÖÐkappaÎļþ¼ÐϵÄin.langevin¼ÆËãʱ£¬·¢ÏÖζÈ×èÄáϵÊýµÄ²»Í¬¶ÔÈȵ¼ÂʵÄÓ°ÏìºÜ´ó£¬ÇëÎÊÎÒÓ¦¸ÃÔõôµ÷Õâ¸ö²ÎÊý£¬ÔõÑù²ÅÄÜÅжϵ÷µÄ¶Ô²»¶ÔÄØ£¿@oxox6085 |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓÐÈÔûÊÕµ½ÐÅÏ¢µÄ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
»ù½ð²»ÖУ¬¹²Ãã
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Â鷳ר¼ÒÃÇ¿´¿´ÆÀίÃǵÄÒâ¼û£¨F¿ÚÃæÉÏ£©
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
2026ÄêÒ¶ÆóËï»ù½ð
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
»ù½ðϵͳʲôÄÚÈÝҲûÓÐ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ϊʲô×ÊÖúÊý¸÷´ó¸ßУ¶¼´´Ð¸ߣ¬×Ô¼ºÉêÇëÔõô¾ÍÕâôÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
Ôõô²é°¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
brucefan
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +218 - Ä£ÄâEPI: 4
- Ó¦Öú: 422 (˶ʿ)
- ½ð±Ò: 2294.8
- É¢½ð: 1720
- ºì»¨: 88
- Ìû×Ó: 1423
- ÔÚÏß: 670.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3048965
- ×¢²á: 2014-03-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
- ¹ÜϽ: ·Ö×ÓÄ£Äâ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
| Plot the results with different values of that parameter in the same figure and see if they converge. Kappa should not be sensitive to that parameter if it is chosen in an appropriate range. I think theoretically, the larger the time constant (with weaker coupling to thermostat) , the better the results. But the simulation time needed to achieve steady state (with well-defined temperature gradient) may also increase with increasing time constant, making the computation more time consuming. Good luck to you! |
2Â¥2016-05-03 21:03:21









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ͶƱ:
10