| 查看: 3218 | 回复: 16 | |||
hao123czq8878金虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
投稿EC，被拒后，申诉后编辑来信，我该怎么回复？ 已有2人参与
|
|
文章投稿EC,两个审稿人，一个小修，一个说文章值得发表但是建议转投材料类杂志。编辑依据审稿意见拒稿。我们感觉有申诉的可能，写了申诉信，认真回复了审稿人的问题，几天后编辑来信说有一个问题回答的不专业，让我修改回答（详情见编辑来信） In the case of your manuscript, referee #2 raised very important? issues and on the basis of his/her comments your manuscript was rejected. Examination of your replies shows that one of the major issue (This manuscript does not make any significant distinction between this work and the papers that have been published) is not specifically addressed in your replies. The novelty and significance should be demonstrated by proper comparison and discussion of your results relative to those of the recent literature. I will be willing to consider a new version of your work if the above mentioned issue is? properly addressed. Your new manuscript will have to be convincing enough as it will be? sent out to external referees, including those of the first review. 那么问题来了：（1）我需要修改手稿吗？？ 如果需要修改手稿，毕竟已经拒稿了，感觉只能重投才能上传新手稿给编辑了？ （2）申诉信肯定需要重写了。然后用不同 颜色标注这次写申诉信与原来的申诉信的不同的。重点从新回答编辑说的那个问题。 请大家说说到底应该怎么回复编辑？？ 谢谢在线等 |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐
 看中的 |
» 猜你喜欢
Journal of Alloys and Compounds投稿过程
已经有2人回复
-
澳大利亚皇家墨尔本理工大学（RMIT）理学院招收2027博士生
已经有62人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有199人回复
-
为什么现在电催化越来越卷？从“只看效果”到“全周期低成本”选型转变
已经有0人回复
-
电催化氧化反应器现场运维，不可忽视的安全风险与防控措施
已经有0人回复
-
电池测试中dQ/dV怎么理解
已经有1人回复
-
精细化工浓水做零排放，前端到底该配什么氧化工艺？
已经有0人回复
-
大湾区大学姚瑶课题组2027届博士生招生 （与中山大学联合培养）
已经有25人回复
-
氯离子浓度对电催化处理效果的双重影响实测与参数优化
已经有0人回复
-
阴极协同电催化技术处理高盐难降解化工废水的机理与工程应用研究
已经有0人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
hao123czq8878
金虫 (正式写手)
 |
2楼2016-04-30 20:53:37
王续龙aiying
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
小白一枚
- 应助: 30 (小学生)
- 金币: 12595.9
- 散金: 137
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 3411
- 在线: 3506.7小时
- 虫号: 2716278
- 注册: 2013-10-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体与表面物理化学
|
回答2问题：编辑说你的写的论文创新性不足，你的工作内容没有很好的表达出来。你应该重写你的手搞，仔细比较你的结果与别人的最新结果 。然后仔细讨论。至于回编辑信，个人觉得应该仔细说你的创新性，你的结果与别人不同在什么地方。申诉信应该不用写了。编辑如果同意你在把你新写手稿交上去。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
hao123czq8878
3楼2016-04-30 23:25:40
王续龙aiying
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
小白一枚
- 应助: 30 (小学生)
- 金币: 12595.9
- 散金: 137
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 3411
- 在线: 3506.7小时
- 虫号: 2716278
- 注册: 2013-10-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体与表面物理化学
4楼2016-04-30 23:28:23
hao123czq8878
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1058.7
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 944
- 在线: 335.6小时
- 虫号: 767250
- 注册: 2009-05-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体无机化学
5楼2016-05-01 22:05:59
jxp1127
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 15 (小学生)
- 金币: 4889.9
- 红花: 11
- 帖子: 771
- 在线: 179.4小时
- 虫号: 195534
- 注册: 2006-02-23
- 专业: 有机合成
6楼2016-05-03 07:33:31
lsh200100
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
红尘来去一场梦
- ECEPI: 1
- 应助: 159 (高中生)
- 金币: 8499.9
- 散金: 65
- 红花: 89
- 帖子: 2068
- 在线: 524.6小时
- 虫号: 539244
- 注册: 2008-04-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
7楼2016-05-04 17:27:48
胡琪
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- ECEPI: 3
- 应助: 830 (博后)
- 金币: 10236.1
- 散金: 500
- 红花: 68
- 帖子: 2977
- 在线: 881.6小时
- 虫号: 1346956
- 注册: 2011-07-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机合成
8楼2016-05-05 06:45:29
lightningxcq
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5277.4
- 散金: 192
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 500
- 在线: 271.3小时
- 虫号: 2514561
- 注册: 2013-06-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属结构材料
9楼2016-05-10 17:21:49
hao123czq8878
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1058.7
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 944
- 在线: 335.6小时
- 虫号: 767250
- 注册: 2009-05-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 固体无机化学
|
Appeal for Electrochemistry Communications Dear Dr. **** Thank you very much for your efficient work in processing our manuscript entitled “ ******”. (Manuscript No:******) We are sorry to learn that our manuscript was rejected based on the comments “ this manuscript does not meet the high standard of Electrochemistry Communications ” from the second referee. As you may see the first referee suggests the manuscript “ can be accepted after minor revision”. After we have carefully read the comments from the reviewers, we realize that major merits of our work were not fully identified or recognized by the second reviewer. Here we would emphasize that the most notable merits of our manuscript include: 1) . For these reasons, we still think that our research is highly valuable and the manuscript is very suitable for the wide readership of Electrochemistry Communications. Therefore, we truly hope that you could send it to a third referee for a review and then reconsider your decision. Thank you very much for your help ! We look forward to hearing from you. Yours sincerely, *** ***/2016 We have addressed the comments raised by the reviewers, point by point responses to the reviewer’s comments were listed as follows (the changes in revise appeal letter were indicated in red) Reviewer’comments: Reviewer #1 The authors report a new composition on**** . The work is interesting and can be accepted after minor revision. (1)The defect with ******* Answer: we highly appreciate your kind suggestions. In this work, |
10楼2016-05-10 23:32:39
