24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 6090  |  回复: 14
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zhaocl

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

[交流] 关于赝电容电极材料和Battery-type electrode materials的争论已有8人参与

最近做钴、镍等相关赝电容电极材料的的朋友在投稿时都会遇到审稿人提到Battery-type electrode materials,如下:
(1)“The as-prepared Ni3(VO4)2 material in this manuscript is termed as a “supercapacitor” electrode material, however, the authors need to carefully check whether Ni3(VO4)2 is a supercapacitor electrode material. The sharp redox peaks in CVs and the flat voltage plateaus in the charge-discharge curves indicate that this material should be a typical battery-type electrode material instead of a pseudocapacitive electrode material. This means that all terms and the calculation of electrochemical performance based on the supercapacitor in this manuscript are unacceptable. More discussion about this issue could be found in literatures, e.g., DOI: 10.1149/2.0201505jes, 10.1021/nn503164x, 10.1126/science.1249625, 10.1126/science.1213003, and B. E. Conway’s book (Electrochemical supercapacitors: scientific fundamentals and technological applications).
(2)However, to the best of my knowledge and according to the most recent studies, such system shoudn't be classified as pseudocapacitive material. It's because its electrochemical characteristics is different from a fundamental definition of capacitance (or pseudocapacitance). I'm aware that there is a growing number of reports describing "pseudocapacitive" nature of such oxides as cobalt or nickel but from the fundamental point of view such diffusion controlled faradaic processes charactersistics of aforementioned materials have nothing to do with simple capacitor (or pseudocapacitor)-type storage of electrical charge. Therefore, I suggest to change reported specific capacitances (in F/g) values into specific capacities (in C/g or mAh/g). Also, the energy densities should be calculated using recently suggested methods of evaluation reported in following papers:
        Thierry Brousse, Daniel Belanger, Jeffrey W. Long, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 162 A5185-A5189 (2015)
*        Laheäär, A., Przygocki, P., Abbas, Q., Béguin, Electrochemistry Communications, 60 (2015), 21-25
        Further, terms such as " pseudocapacitance", pseudocapacitive" should be used in the manuscript only to distinguish between real pseudocapacitance (such as observed and measured eg. for RuOx or MnOx) and battery-type behaviour such as those reported in the paper. To conclude: the material is of a great potential but as high power battery electrode, rather than capacitive (or pseudocapacitive) material.
(3)Materials like Co3O4 should be called as Battery-type electrode, not the Pseudocapacitance according to Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 162 (2015) A5185-A5189.

最近有几篇文章是彻底妥协了,如:
1)Physicochemical identity and charge storage properties of battery-type nickel oxide material and its composites with activated carbon. ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA  卷: 194   页: 480-488   出版年: MAR 10 2016
2) Zhen Li*, et al. A facile enhancement in battery-type of capacitive performance of spinel NiCo2O4 nanostructure via directly tuning thermal decomposition temperature. ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA  卷: 191   页: 364-374   出版年: FEB 10 2016
3) Erqing Xie*, et al. Construction of hierarchical ZnCo2O4@NixCo2x(OH)6x core/shell nanowire arrays for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016,4, 173-182.
4) Zhongtai Zhang*, et al. Hydroxyl compensation effects on the cycle stability of Nickel-Cobalt layered double hydroxides synthesized via solvothermal method.
ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA  卷: 182   页: 445-451   出版年: NOV 10 2015.
5) High-performance hybrid supercapacitor with 3D hierarchical porous flower-like layered double hydroxide grown on nickel foam as binder-free electrode. Journal of Power Sources, Volume 318, 30 June 2016, Pages 76–85.

关键是 Daniel Belanger, Jeffrey W. Long, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 162 A5185-A5189 (2015)这篇文章很一般,但很多赝电容的文章审稿都要落到这个人手里,他顺便引用几篇Science上似是而非的文章,要求你必须按照他这篇文章的要求来修改。

但是Gogotsi et al (Science, 2011, 334, 917) suggesting to create a National or International testing facility for benchmarking electrodes and devices similar to the facilities that exist for benchmarking photovoltaics .
“There should be clear rules for reporting the performance of new materials for EES devices. This would help scientists who are not experts in the field, as well as
engineers, investors, and the general public, who rely on the data published by the scientists, to assess competing claims.”

不知道大家遇到这个问题该如何处理?

非常感谢您的交流!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaocl

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

However, when taking into account the fundamental definition of capacitance [1], the term pseudocapacitance should be used [16] only for the materials having the electrochemical signatures of the capacitive-type electrodes, i.e. characterized by linear dependencies of charge accumulated within certain ranges of applied potentials and the linear (mirror-like) galvanostatic charge-discharge responses [15]. Having in mind this definition, nickel oxide (undergoing charging-discharging according to a Faradaic mechanism) should be considered more as high-power battery-type rather than pseudocapacitive material.
[1] B.E. Conway. Electrochemical Supercapacitors: Scientific Fundamentals and Technological Applications. Springer US (1999)
[16] T. Brousse, D. Bélanger, J.W. Long. J. Electrochem. Soc., 162 (2015), pp. A5185–A5189.
6楼2016-05-02 23:39:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaocl

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by zhhwsp at 2016-05-09 10:17:24
楼主也妥协了?...

呵呵,还是按照电池电容的比容量来改是对的,赝电容的机理确实被理解错了,
8楼2016-05-09 11:42:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaocl

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
10楼: Originally posted by 瓜大小兰 at 2016-06-17 22:50:22
楼主引的几篇文章中就有我的一篇。
我觉得你是小看这篇文章了, Daniel Belanger, Jeffrey W. Long, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 162 A5185-A5189 (2015), 大牛就是大牛,到现在这篇论文都被引了超过 ...

Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors
Nature Energy, 2016
http://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy201670
大牛Dunn & P. Simon还是没有提到电池型电容,还是说的赝电容,要想重新梳理的话还是在Science或者Nature上发篇评论,这样很快就可以推广开。仅仅靠每次别人投稿时稿子落在自己手里,而要求投稿人必须说清楚这个问题,引用这篇文献,力量太小,
11楼2016-06-19 15:54:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaocl

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by 瓜大小兰 at 2016-06-20 13:52:53
确实,纠正错误总是很难的,因为有可能会得罪一些人。
我最近凑筹划写篇综述,相关的机理和计算也会包括进去,我觉得科研本身就是一个严谨的东西,所以,当遇到真正的问题的时候,每个人都需要静下心来想想,做出 ...

有道理,
13楼2016-06-20 17:07:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhaocl 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见