| ²é¿´: 614 | »Ø¸´: 1 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
outspace588Òø³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¶Ô±à¼¾Ü¸åÐŵĻظ´£ÐãÐãżµÄÓ¢ÎÄ
|
||
|
һƪ¸å¼þ£¬Í¶µ½¹úÍ⣬½Ó½üÈýÄêʱ¼äµÄÉó¸å£¬ÆÚ¼äÓÐ5λÉó¸åÈ˲ÎÓëÉó¸å£¬ÈýÂÖµÄÖØ´óÐ޸ģ¬ÖÕÓÚ±»±ÐµôÁË¡£ÒÔÏÂÊÇÎÒÂÛÎı»±Ðºó¸ø±à¼µÄ»ØÐÅ¡£½ñÌìÔٴο´µ½Õâ·âÐżþ£¬Í»È»¸Ðµ½Ó¢ÎĺÃÏóдµÃºÜ²»´í£¬»Ðã±¼äÄÑÒÔÏàÐÅÊdzö×ÔÎÒµÄÊֱʡ£ºÇºÇ£¬¹ý·µÄ¾ý×Ó¿´×Ÿø¸öÆÀ¼Û°É¡£ Dear editor: Thanks for your letter about the decision of my manuscript entitled ¡°¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á". It is a pity that my manuscript can not be published in the International Journal of ¡Á¡Á. However, it is even a greater pity for me that the peer referee process terminated. Though it is rather a long time process, actually, I had been enjoying this process. Your patience with my manuscript and the referees¡¯ great effort strongly impressed upon me. Especially, with the comments of the referees, some new light often shed on me when I re-read my manuscript every several months and this excited me. Also, the comments contained in your decision letter are greatly helpful with the improvement of my manuscript. Based on these comments, I am now busy making another important revision, and that¡¯s why I reply to you after quite a long time. I am confident that the current manuscript is a great improvement from the original one, and obviously, your work and the referees¡¯ effort significantly contributed to this. Yours sincerely ¡Á¡Á¡Á 2007-12-31 [ Last edited by outspace588 on 2008-10-26 at 15:50 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§070300 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
297£¬¹¤¿Æµ÷¼Á?
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
22408 312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
ÊÕµ½¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Áµ«ÊÇÈ¥²»ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
260Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¼±Ðèµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
HIT-zsq
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 187.7
- É¢½ð: 200
- Ìû×Ó: 68
- ÔÚÏß: 69.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 433307
- ×¢²á: 2007-08-18
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϵÄÖÆ±¸¿ÆÑ§Óë¿çѧ
2Â¥2009-05-21 15:53:56













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥