| ²é¿´: 2478 | »Ø¸´: 16 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
WSGJ2012ľ³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇóÖú×迹ÎÊÌâ ÒÑÓÐ5È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
×î½üͶÁËÆªÎÄÕ£¬Éó¸åÈËÕë¶Ô×迹ÎÊÌ⣬Ìá³öÁËһЩÎÊÌ⣬±¾È˶Ô×迹·½ÃæÍêÈ«²»¶®£¬ÎÞÄÎÔÚ´ËÇóÖú¸÷룬ÔÚ´ËÏÈлл¸÷λÁË£¡ 1. Why electrochemical impedance measurements were performing only at open circuit potential? You should measured and analyzed (Fig. 6a) electrochemical impedance data not only at open circuit potential but at different electrode potentials as well (for example -0.8 V; -0.4 V and -0.1 V vs Hg/HgO) ΪʲôÎÒÃDzâÊÔ×迹һ°ãÊÇÔÚ¿ªÂ·µçѹϲâÄØ£¿ÎªÊ²Ã´Éó¸åÈËÒªÔÚ²»Í¬µçÊÆÏ²âÊÔ£¬µçÊÆµÄÑ¡Ôñ»á¶Ô×迹½á¹ûÓÐʲôӰÏ죿 2. Why the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements were performed only to 0.01 Hz? Is it sufficient? ÎÒ²âÊÔµÄÆµÂÊ·¶Î§Îª0.01~100000 Hz£¬Éó¸åÈËȴ˵µÍÆµÇøµÄ·¶Î§»¹²»¹»£¬ÄÇÊÇÒª²âµ½¶àÉÙÄØ£¿0.001 Hz£¿ÕâÁ½Õß²âÊÔ½á¹û»áÓÐÊ²Ã´Çø±ðÄØ£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÕÐÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î÷ÄÏij211ÕÐ27½ì²©Ê¿
ÒѾÓÐ33È˻ظ´
·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ51È˻ظ´
´óÁ¬¹¤Òµ½ÜÇà/³¤½ÍŶÓ-ÉúÎïÖʲÄÁÏ-´¢ÄÜµç³Ø·½ÏòÕÐÊÕ2026¼¶²©Ê¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸º£´ó£¬0703»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶304·Ö£¬Óдó´´ÏîÄ¿£¬Ëļ¶Òѹý
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
070300 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÉîÛÚ´óѧ¸ßµÈÑо¿ÔºÕÔΰ¿ÎÌâ×éÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§µ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Çൺ´óѧ¹Ì̬µç³ØÑо¿ÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏ¡¢»¯Ñ§¡¢ÎïÀíµÈ·½Ïò²©Ê¿Ñо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ì085602 305·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
È£²¡ÓëÑÀÖܲ¡µÄ±íÊö
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
WSGJ2012
ľ³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5561.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 38
- ÔÚÏß: 56.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 979730
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-23
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
6Â¥2016-04-10 11:12:21
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
2Â¥2016-04-09 12:22:01
perseus1989
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 59 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 4307.5
- É¢½ð: 315
- ºì»¨: 11
- Ìû×Ó: 747
- ÔÚÏß: 467.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1593972
- ×¢²á: 2012-02-01
- רҵ: ½ðÊô½á¹¹²ÄÁÏ
3Â¥2016-04-09 12:24:53
langzhizhou
°æÖ÷ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ECEPI: 13
- Ó¦Öú: 1072 (²©ºó)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.631
- ½ð±Ò: 32033.8
- É¢½ð: 6372
- ºì»¨: 305
- Ìû×Ó: 3172
- ÔÚÏß: 409.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 507377
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-19
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: µç»¯Ñ§

4Â¥2016-04-09 19:42:34













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥