24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1205  |  回复: 8

碗不如锅大

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] under review 40天,major revise,大家看看机会大吗 已有6人参与

审稿人1意见较多,审稿人2的答复非常少,好像是正面评价
Reviewer #1
The crop morphology, light capture and use efficiency in response to intercropping configuration are interesting topic. The study conducted 3 year experiments with detailed measurements on yield, morphological traits, light intensity for both PAR and R:FR. However, my main concerns are:
(1)     The scientific questions are not clear in this paper, why study morphology and how to use these data.
(2)     The morphological changes of component crops in intercropping are not used to estimate light interception, and then, these results is not well connected with the objectives of overyielding and light use efficiency.
(3)     The methodology of calculating light interception fraction and amount is not clear and incorrect from my understanding or it is not clearly and correctly presented. 
(4)     Yield and dry matter were given only the average for three years. That is not enough to address the objectives. 
(5)     Terminology, definition of parameters and English are not good or not precise. 

Detail comments:
长达两页半

Reviewer #2: The results presented by the authors are relevant and well presented. 
However, the manuscript brings me some concerns about the quantities of maize and soybean lines used in the treatments. Why the authors decided to use two lines of corn and soybean? Would not it be applicable use amount of lines traditionally used in a seeder grain?
Nevertheless the results are interesting to be published in this journal after reviewing the considerations.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

碗不如锅大

新虫 (初入文坛)

中的可能性大不大
2楼2016-03-23 20:34:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

274942652

新虫 (初入文坛)

3楼2016-03-23 23:59:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

crazydr

新虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
major revision机会不小的,主要看怎么耐心、全面的回答

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2016-03-24 00:01:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ggamis

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
意见还不错啊,interesting,well presented。

好好回答问题,希望还是挺大的。小问题有点多,稍微耐心点。
5楼2016-03-24 09:41:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

274942652

新虫 (初入文坛)

6楼2016-03-24 19:36:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

swby

金虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
全靠response,一定要好好回答,每个细节都要有回复。
7楼2016-03-24 19:37:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huhuheihei

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这审稿意见也不多啊 很正常的
8楼2016-03-24 19:40:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

国际科学编辑

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
没什么大问题,不需要补实验,主要是分析和写作,建议改好后找人润色下语言。可以试试苏州国际科学编辑。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
9楼2016-03-24 19:42:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 碗不如锅大 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见