|
|
[交流]
帮忙分析分析重投中的机会大不大
两个意见完全相反
1:
The manuscript is of high scientific value, extremely professional write and the graphical part is really exceptional. i don't have comments or suggestions, only editor comments being allowed.
2:
指出两个问题……
In summary I can not recommend to accept the paper but to completely reject it
编辑:
I think reviewer #2 made valid comments. Thus, I don't think the paper is suitable for publication in JMS. If you can address the two concerns of the reviewer #2, we would be happy to reconsider resubmision of the revision to JMS.
重投是不是还要送到第二个人审啊?
发自小木虫IOS客户端
[ Last edited by edisonyu on 2016-3-18 at 14:07 ] |
» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有22人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有14人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有11人回复
售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有12人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴
|