| 查看: 1018 | 回复: 5 | ||
| 【奖励】 本帖被评价5次，作者oldfish9882增加金币 5 个 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
[资源]
《Analytical Characterization of Aluminum, Steel, and Superalloys》
|
||
|
Analytical Characterization of Aluminum, Steel, and Superalloys By D. Scott MacKenzie, George E. Totten Publisher: CRC Number Of Pages: 768 Publication Date: 2005-10-10 ISBN-10 / ASIN: 0824758439 ISBN-13 / EAN: 9780824758431 Binding: Hardcover This one-of-a-kind reference examines conventional and advanced methodologies for the quantitative evaluation of properties and characterization of microstructures in metals. It presents methods for uncovering valuable information including precipitate mechanisms, kinetics, stability, crystallographic orientation, the effects of thermo-mechanical processing, and residual stress. The editors of Analytical Characterization of Aluminum, Steel, and Superalloys enlist top industry researchers and practitioners from around the world to analyze the methodologies presented in their areas of expertise. Following traditional metallography methods, the book features an atlas of microstructures for aluminum, steel, and superalloys. The text also examines several material characterization methods rarely covered in other references, provides the framework for using advanced laboratory techniques, and discusses component failure identification methods and other measurements that are crucial to components manufacturing. Enabling the evolution of stronger and more function-specific compositions, Analytical Characterization of Aluminum, Steel, and Superalloys offers engineers, researchers, and materials scientists an invaluable reference of many advanced laboratory techniques in the context of characterization and property evaluation methodologies for metals and alloys. http://ifile.it/pektmhz/0824758439.zip |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有13人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有13人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
2楼2009-09-30 09:15:33
3楼2009-09-30 22:50:54
简单回复
ycwbycwb4楼
2009-10-01 08:01
回复
