24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3974)
>虫友互识 (375)
>导师招生 (314)
>文献求助 (268)
>休闲灌水 (164)
>考博 (146)
>论文投稿 (129)
>教师之家 (127)
>基金申请 (102)
>硕博家园 (88)
>考研 (77)
>博后之家 (62)
>论文道贺祈福 (62)
>找工作 (58)
>招聘信息布告栏 (56)
>公派出国 (42)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

pinkfrog

木虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 3920.2
帖子: 48
在线: 226小时
虫号: 443329
注册: 2007-10-27
专业: 生物医学系统建模及仿真

[交流] 等得有点不懂了已有4人参与

杂志是Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing，一审2个月给了个大修。6周修回后，给了个Minor Rev。Reviewer的意见是这样的：

Reviewer #1: The manuscript has been largely improved. The authors replied satisfactorily to all my issues.

Please pay attention that the term "respiratory sinus arrhythmia" usually indicates the rhythmical changes of the heart period at the respiratory rate regardless of the mechanism that generate them (e.g. contribution of respiratory centers, vagal modulations, stretching of the lung receptors, respiratory modifications of the cardiac axis, ...). Therefore, your model does account for respiratory sinus arrhythmia but it do not account for all possible physiological mechanisms that generate it. Discussion could be modified and render more precise in relation to this issue.

Reviewer #2: Comments to the Author
The authors reasonably addressed all of the questions and make significant improvements. The manuscript is now notoriously better compared to the previous version. The figures and table contents added are also very helpful for a better understanding of the research project.

编辑的意见是：
Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).

文中其实就是Discussion中的一小段涉及这个问题，4,5行吧，按照审稿意见修改投出去了。

首先，我觉得这个问题编辑自己看看改好没就差不多了吧，毕竟审稿人也只是说could be modified之类的。结果居然又送出去审了，还审了整整1个月。
其次，系统显示Reviews Completed了以后，过了10多天还没动静。

有点慌了，是哪里没做对么？还是只是编辑比较谨慎+太忙了？能想到的不妥之处可能就是小修修回太快了，3天发回去了，可真的也只要改一个表述而已。

求点拨……

回复此楼