| 查看: 256 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liaowangna将赠送您 70 个金币 | ||
liaowangna新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助如何回复审稿人提出的晶体学意见
|
|
|
投了一篇Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry，审稿人提了两个专业的问题，求助各位大牛，该如何回复，谢谢。 （1）I am puzzled by the displacement parameters in the two structures. The data collection temperature was 100 K, but even so the adps seem tiny. In fact for the triclinic structure, refinement with Shelxl rather than olex.refine causes the O-atom to become non-positive definite. I notice that very tight ISOR restraints were applied to the refinement, though this isn't mentioned in the experimental section and such high weights can not be physically reasonable. ISOR 0.001 0.002 $C $N $O $F ISOR 0.0001 0.0002 S1 （2）Both structures were determined using Cu-K\a radiation and since they contain iodine, absorption was fierce. I suspect that the multiscan corrections applied are not quite up to the job, and preliminary face indexed corrections might be a good idea for both structures. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
河北省基金
已经有21人回复
-
经常觉得挺累的
已经有14人回复
-
女博士高校择业三天之内签合同，求支招
已经有7人回复
-
优秀毕业论文 指导教师，普通老师有希望吗？
已经有8人回复
-
TsCl保护羟基为什么不反应
已经有23人回复
-
人生
已经有10人回复
-
有没有在职教师同时做博后的？
已经有8人回复
-
化学B口多少分能上会呀
已经有9人回复
-
超过35岁的海外博士还可以进高校吗？
已经有7人回复
-
来用亲身体会，一起说说年轻老师的辛苦
已经有26人回复
4