| 查看: 1582 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者奥特曼的益达将赠送您 20 个金币 | |||
[求助]
请问各位大佬们，综述性论文的审稿意见一般都是怎么样的？已有4人参与
|
|||
| 如有实例让我参考参考，在下感激不尽！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
连续3年国社科青年本子都没中，今年最后一次青年了，写本子完全浪费时间
已经有8人回复
-
投稿竟然倒在了Scientific Reports上。
已经有14人回复
-
网传南京林业大学加拿大博士首聘期不合格，自杀
已经有29人回复
-
有博导缺学生吗，我可以当牛做马
已经有41人回复
-
29 岁去读一个双非学校机械工程的博士 还有前途吗
已经有20人回复
-
怎么成为NSFC评审专家？
已经有9人回复
-
博导推荐，申博，博士招生
已经有5人回复
-
宋凯
已经有7人回复
-
领养小孩
已经有9人回复
-
谁要做个人网站，可以交流啊！
已经有18人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +13613 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 26325 (院士)
- 贵宾: 405.379
- 金币: 2333820
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2027
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1518878
- 在线: 61846.1小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
奥特曼的益达2楼2022-11-19 09:09:00
3楼2022-11-19 09:25:53
|
主要看审稿人的水平，水平低的就提一些细节问题，比如文字有误、图有误啥的，水平高的那就关注的很多了，整体逻辑是否完整，观点及论述是否新颖独到突出，抄袭成分多还是自己提炼归纳多，cross-plot做得怎么样，语言水平如何等等 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
4楼2022-11-19 23:55:27
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4340 (副教授)
- 金币: 30716.7
- 散金: 18010
- 红花: 322
- 帖子: 10555
- 在线: 1465.2小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
下面是我们一篇发表在 ACS Catalysis 综述文章的审稿意见 Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: Ligand-free noble metal nanocatalysts have got increasing attention during the past decade due to the surface clean property and excellent catalytic activity. This review is a comprehensive and systematic review summarizing the development and application of ligand-free noble metal nanocatalysts. This review summarized three synthetic methods for ligand-free synthesis , i.e. stabilization by small molecule, stabilization by modified support and constructing self-supported NPs, and concluded the applications of these synthesized ligand-free nanocatalysts for energy-related electrochemical reactions e.g. LFOR, ORR, HER and OER. Major revision is recommended to improve the quality of this work. 1. The keywords are not suitable. One is catalysis and the other is catalytic application. The meaning is somewhat repetitive. It is recommended to choose another suitable keyword. 2. Subheadings "2. The Need for Ligand-free Synthesis" and "3. The Methods for Ligand-free Synthesis" are not are inappropriate and incomplete. It is better to change to "The Need for Ligand-free Noble Metal Nanocatalysts Synthesis" and "The Methods for Ligand-free Noble Metal Nanocatalysts Synthesis". 3. The content of the fourth part is too brief. Electrocatalysis covers a wide range, and common reactions such as carbon dioxide reduction and nitrogen reduction are not included. 4. The differences between metal nanoparticles with ligands and without ligands, and the comparison of advantages and disadvantages between them can be summarized in a table, which will be more clear. 5. For ligand-free metal nanoparticles, how to prove the nanoparticles are ligand-free? What test methods can be used to characterize the ligand-free nanoparticles? It is better to give some examples or summarize the characterizations methods. Reviewer #2: In this manuscript, authors introduced the progress of the ligand-free synthesis of noble metal nanocatalysts for electrocatalysis. Although this review contains many different sections, each section seems to be relatively weak. For the sections of catalysis-related application, the authors only simply introduce few examples for catalytic applications without deep understanding and discussion. Considering the quality of this review, therefore, I could not suggest the publication of this work in Chemical Engineering Journal. I still have some concerns as bellow: 1. Some figures and images are not sufficiently clear, especially picture of Figure 6, Figure 10. I suggest citing the high resolution pictures from references. 2. As for the section of synthetic routes, the authors should also comparatively analyze the advantages and disadvantages of every synthetic route. 3. In this review, the author introduced several works related to Ligand-free Noble Metal Nanocatalysts for different catalytic reactions. However, the discussions on ORR, OER and HER are too thin. 4. Noble Metal Nanocatalysts are widely applied in diverse catalytic reactions. Some important catalytic reactions (e.g., CO2 reduction, nitrogen reduction reaction) should be summarized and discussed. 5. It would be great that the authors could provide some characterization discussions about the Ligand-free Noble Metal Nanocatalysts. 6. Format reference 54, 87, 114. The subscript should be used for a molecular formula. Reviewer #3: Comments: The review comprehensively summaries the ligand-free preparation of noble metal nanocatalysts and their electrocatalytic applications. Three synthesis methods for ligand-free synthesis (stabilization by small molecule, stabilization by modified support and constructing self-supported NPs) are classified and typical examples are given. The applications in energy-related electrochemical reactions are concluded. Most of summary can be supported by listed research, however, it is lack of some insight. The specific comments are listed below. 1. Highlight may be supplemented for directly hint the topic of review. 2. Abstract: Too much information was put forward on the lack of traditional colloidal synthesis method, but comparatively little useful information was given about the contents and applications of energy-related electrochemical reactions (which should be the focus of this review article). So, I would recommend the authors reduce/minimize the former part; but instead strengthen the latter part to illustrate the applications of the catalysts with ligand-free properties. Also, please explain why synthesized methods of the catalysts with ligand-free properties are important. 3. Introduction: Certainly the topic of this review is novel but it is not clear about the novelty in terms of energy-related electrochemical reactions. Why the applications in energy-related electrochemical reactions are summarized? 4. I think it is a good idea to make some conclusive statement about the comparison between the different synthesis methods of ligand-free noble metal nanocatalysts by listing a table. 5. The findings from past study were not well synthesized and critically evaluated in section 4. I would suggest synthesizing and generalizing the common findings from similar research and critically evaluated of these work in terms of progress and limitations. Some related published references could be discussed and summarized, such as: Environmental Science Nano, 2021, 8, 3067-3097, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 422, 126950, and Environmental Science and Pollution Research, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20064-w. 6. Overall, some ideas were put forward here but these ideas have already been given for other types of ligand-free noble metal nanocatalysts in the literature. So, I think this section needs to be improved to give the real insights from the authors themselves. |
5楼2022-11-21 05:09:11
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4340 (副教授)
- 金币: 30716.7
- 散金: 18010
- 红花: 322
- 帖子: 10555
- 在线: 1465.2小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
6楼2022-11-21 05:10:34
steven_198377
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 金币: 304.8
- 散金: 4
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 451
- 在线: 156.3小时
- 虫号: 311922
- 注册: 2006-12-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
【答案】应助回帖
|
可以去这个网址查看： https://cjl.lightpublishing.cn/v ... x=2&lang=zh 这里面都是综述文章，每篇文章主页上的“附件资源”中有作者的回复信和审稿人意见，可以下载查看。 |
7楼2022-11-22 16:29:25
xjtufscjw
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5980.5
- 散金: 44
- 帖子: 340
- 在线: 29.2小时
- 虫号: 21056825
- 注册: 2020-02-21
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 神经生物学
8楼2022-11-24 21:19:23
100