24小时热门版块排行榜     石溪大学接受考研调剂申请>

【调剂】北京石油化工学院2024年16个专业接受调剂
查看: 1115  |  回复: 6

仙女_1

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 我引用的参考文献的陈述,审稿人不认同这篇文献的观点,我该怎么回答审稿人的意见?已有1人参与

审稿人意见:"Chen et al. investigated the performances of thermal-concentrated solar thermoelectric generators, and it was found that under the situation of forced convection, water cooling was better than air cooling for the net output power of the TEG due to its increased specific heat [1]. " This statement is misleading Ref[1] did say that but it has nothing to do with the performance of the TEG, because it does NOT depend on the specific heat of the coolant. What Ref. 1 meant to say is the TEG performance itself does not change with the types of coolant, but the pumping power to flow the coolant does depend on the coolant properties (water vs air), so the net power (TEG output power minus the pumping power) also depends on the coolant types. In fact, I am not sure if specific heat is the dominant factor for the pumping power. I would guess it is the density. Also, it is very difficult to get the HTC of 1000 W/m2/K for forced  convection with air (that is why an excessive pumping power is needed). In any case, I would urge the authors to carefully and critically review the papers they cited, to make sure they don't just blindly follow the conclusions of these paper or otherwise misinterpret their results.
大致意思是:我引用的这篇文献的观点,审稿人不认同,所以他觉得我在引入这篇文献时在盲从,请问审稿人的这种问题该怎么回答?我直接把这篇文献删掉?好像也不合适啊。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bjvtwdov

新虫 (著名写手)

2楼2020-09-29 20:39:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

不是本人

金虫 (著名写手)

貌似审稿人说你片面理解了引用文献中内容的意思

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2020-09-29 20:42:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

哈娜酱

木虫 (正式写手)

回答引用不太合适,已经换成另外一篇文献?

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2020-09-29 20:42:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
5楼2020-09-29 22:10:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qujia001

金虫 (正式写手)

审稿人认为你没有读懂参考文献,错误理解了参考文献作者的意思。

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2020-09-30 05:12:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

国际科学编辑

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
仙女_1: 金币+10, ★★★★★最佳答案 2020-10-03 12:24:04
估计是citation用可以不合适,换一篇文献或者重新表述文字

发自小木虫IOS客户端
7楼2020-09-30 07:42:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 仙女_1 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[有机交流] 环肽的合成 +3 徐来不惊 2024-04-25 6/300 2024-04-27 13:54 by xxzhangci
[教师之家] 博士论文被抄袭 +26 和尚敲小木鱼 2024-04-22 43/2150 2024-04-27 11:14 by liuyuzhou
[论文投稿] 投稿RSC旗下杂志突然间看不到投稿状态,里面投稿的文章信息不见了,有遇到过的吗? 50+3 dlying 2024-04-26 3/150 2024-04-27 09:58 by bobvan
[论文投稿] AC审稿 +3 马winner 2024-04-26 6/300 2024-04-27 09:08 by 马winner
[硕博家园] 聊天 +12 暮色恋伊人 2024-04-22 13/650 2024-04-27 08:40 by WASM
[论文投稿] with editor 两个月了,什么原因? +7 yiersan9 2024-04-24 16/800 2024-04-27 03:25 by yiersan9
[有机交流] 如何分离原料与产品 5+4 qwerasdf587 2024-04-24 13/650 2024-04-26 23:18 by 119966984
[考博] 真的好想读博! +15 wangzhe_bs 2024-04-22 22/1100 2024-04-26 22:11 by 小木雄子
[论文投稿] 研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平 5+5 wjtab 2024-04-22 15/750 2024-04-26 19:25 by wjtab
[硕博家园] 考研,求职还是考编? +15 xizj 2024-04-21 24/1200 2024-04-26 11:49 by Kan客
[考博] 取博导收留 5+4 zzb777888 2024-04-20 10/500 2024-04-26 08:52 by polymerfriend
[教师之家] 某种做法不行。说过几遍了。同学还那样做。再那样做就给低分 +4 河西夜郎 2024-04-24 4/200 2024-04-26 08:51 by Quakerbird
[论文投稿] Nature一直在编辑手里,考虑好几天了,是悬了吗 +12 彩虹初见 2024-04-24 12/600 2024-04-25 19:21 by 雪径踏青
[访问学者] CSC的访问学者申请,没有个评审意见,也不知道怎么改,还有必要申请吗 +4 flyingship 2024-04-20 4/200 2024-04-24 21:09 by 59038mute
[考博] 24年 申博 化学/材料 一作6篇sci +9 wangyp123 2024-04-23 11/550 2024-04-24 19:01 by bangbangbiu
[基金申请] 化学结清有情发出来了 +3 starboy7286 2024-04-20 3/150 2024-04-24 15:52 by 嘿,黑贝
[考博] 博士招生 +4 zx179 2024-04-24 7/350 2024-04-24 15:01 by H考研成功
[教师之家] 大家访学都是怎么找的啊? +3 luokereng 2024-04-22 3/150 2024-04-24 11:40 by xuechenli
[考博] 研二光催化6月底4篇2区 +7 wjtab 2024-04-22 11/550 2024-04-23 06:59 by byron2012
[高分子] 请问UV灯是365nm的,那么选光引发剂的波长选多少的?要完全一致吗? +4 engledd2004 2024-04-21 4/200 2024-04-22 16:08 by wangcz23
信息提示
请填处理意见