|
[½»Á÷]
iScience±¯¾ç£ºnot a bad news though!ÒÑÓÐ13È˲ÎÓë
ÈçÌâ¡£
Éó¸å²Å2¸öÐÇÆÚ¶àÒ»µã£¬ÕæÐÄ¿ì¡£ËäÈ»¾ÜÁË£¬Éí¾°ÙÕ½µÄÀÏ°åȴ˵Ӧ¸ÃÇìףһϣº¡°that is not bad at all, actually this is what i am expecting. ¡±... "come on, xxxx, this is a cell press journal after all, not as easy as you think"
¿´ÁËÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ËäÈ»ÌáÎʽ϶࣬¿´µÃ³öÉó¸åÈË»¹ÊǺܽ÷É÷£¬Ã»ÈÃÎÒÃÇ×öÎÞÀåÍ·µÄʵÑé¡£¼ÓÉϵ¼Ê¦µÄ¹ÄÀø£¬ÐÅÐı¶Ôö£¡
ÓÉÓÚÊǾܸ壬¾Í²»·¢½ð±ÒÁË¡£
dear xxxx,
thank you for submission of your paper to iscience. i have now included the comments that reviewers made on your paper, which i hope you will find useful and constructive. as you will see, the overall view is that the study is potentially interesting, but the recommendation is against publication of the paper in iscience and we have therefore closed the submission.
that said, the reviewers do make suggestions for further experiments and analyses that might guide the paper toward being a stronger candidate for the journal. if you are interested in pursuing further consideration of this work at iscience, you would first need to submit a point-by-point response that outlines how you might be able to address the reviewer concerns, and outlines how any corresponding results and/or edits would be incorporated into a revised manuscript. we would then assess the plan for revision, possibly in consultation with the reviewers. based on these considerations, we would either reactivate the manuscript file to enable resubmission, or reiterate our decision to reject the paper.
also, we recently updated our reviewer questionnaire to help reviewers and authors get the most out of the peer review process. we would appreciate your feedback. please visit the survey here.
i know that this outcome is disappointing, given the hard work that you and your colleagues have put into the paper. i hope that the reviewers' comments will be useful to you as you consider next steps, and i hope that you will consider iscience for future submissions as your interesting work progresses.
sincerely,
xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx, ph.d.
scientific editor, iscience
reviewers' comments
reviewer's responses to questions
....
¾¹ý½üÈý¸öÐÇÆڵĿàÕ½£¬ÖÕÓÚÈ¡µÃеÄʵÑéÊý¾ÝÍêÃÀ»Ø´ðÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û¡£Å£±Ç×ÓÀÏ°åÐÅÐÄÂúÂú£¬ÎÒÃǾö¶¨ÏòiscienceµÚ¶þ´Î³å»÷£¡
ÎÒÏòÀϰ屨¸æ£¬iscienceÖ»ÓÐ4.47·Ö£¬È˼Ҹù±¾²»care£º¡°it is a cell press journal; there is only one cell press in the world; impact factor is nothing under the name of cell¡± (×îºóÒ»¾ä»°Ã»ÌýÇå³þ£¬´ó¸Å¾ÍÊÇÕâ¸öÒâ˼)
[ last edited by ÈÕ²»ÖªÒ¹ºÚ on 2020-7-20 at 00:11 ]
ÀÏ°åÓÖ¿àÐÄÐÞ¸ÄÁË10Ì죬ÖØдÁ˼¸´ó¶Î£¬ÂÛÎÄÒѾÔÙͶiscience£¬Ï£ÍûÕâ´ÎÊǸöºÃ½á¹û£¡
¸ÃºÃºÃ¶È¸ö¼ÙÁË£¬È¥ÄĶùÄØ£¿floridaµÄbeachÊÇÈ¥²»³ÉÁË£¬las vegasºÃÏñÒ²²»Ì«Æ½¡£¹úÄںܺÃÍæ¿Éϧȥ²»ÁË£¬°¦¡£¡£¡£
anyway, keep my fingers crossed!
[ last edited by ÈÕ²»ÖªÒ¹ºÚ on 2020-7-30 at 13:57 ]
¸üÐÂһϡ£ÂÛÎÄ7ÔÂ29ÈÕÖØͶºó8ÔÂ2ÈÕÔÙ´ÎËÍÉó£¬Ó¦¸ÃÊǻص½ÁËÒÔÇ°µÄÉó¸åÈË¡£Ï£ÍûºÃÔË
[ last edited by ÈÕ²»ÖªÒ¹ºÚ on 2020-8-6 at 16:58 ]
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
СÐÞ£¡Éó¸å°ë¸öÔº󷵻أ¬±à¼¸øµÄÊÇСÐÞ£¬·Ç³£¿ªÐÄ£¡£¡£¡
Éó¸åÈË»¹ÊÇÒÔÇ°µÄÄÇЩ£¬ÓÖ¸øÁ˺ܶàϸ½ÚÉϵÄÒâ¼û£¬´ó¶à¶ÔÂÛÎÄÌáÉý´óÓаïÖú¡£ÓÐһЩÒâ¼û¸Ä²»¸ÄÎÞËùν£¬µ«¶Ô´ó¾ÖÎÞÓ°Ï컹ÊÇ°´ÕÕÒâ¼û¸ÄÁË°É¡£¿ÉÒÔ¿´µÃ³öÉó¸åÈ˺ܽ÷É÷£¬±ÜÃâÈÃÎÒÔö¼ÓеÄʵÑ飨ÒòΪ¿¼Âǵ½ÎÒ´óÊÖÊõÒ»´ÎÁË£©¡£
µÈÕýʽ½ÓÊÕºó£¬Ò»¶¨É¢½ð±Ò×£¸£´ó¼Ò£¡
×îºó×£´ó¼ÒÆ쿪µÃʤ£¬Âíµ½³É¹¦£¡
[ Last edited by ÈÕ²»ÖªÒ¹ºÚ on 2020-8-14 at 14:17 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌùר¼ÍƼö
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
|