| 查看: 3398 | 回复: 12 | ||||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
文章仲裁后被拒后 还能拉出来拯救一下么已有12人参与
|
||||
投了Carbohydrate Polymers杂志, under review后出现过一次under editorial evaluation后 再次切换成under review（应该仲裁去了）, 然后under editorial evaluation， 最终文章被拒。看了一下审稿意见，前两个审稿人的意见基本上是小修，第三个审稿人应该是大修，对实验上提出了一些疑问（补实验）。想不通... Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Carbohydrate Polymers. Regretfully I must inform you that the paper is not acceptable for publication. I have taken into account the reviewers' comments and made an editorial decision not to accept the paper. The authors are welcome to submit an improved manuscript fulfilling Carbohydrate Polymers criteria, which include highlighting the main scientific achievements for polysaccharides science, providing a characterization of the component, embedding the figures in the text, and improving the English used. In that case, the Reviewers comments need to be all copied, pasted and all answered. The changes made should be in red in the new manuscript for an easy access to them. See the Guide For Authors. Please find below the referees' comments on your paper. Thank you for your interest in submitting to Carbohydrate Polymers. |
回复此楼» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐
 论文撰写与发表 |
» 猜你喜欢
没学上
已经有11人回复
-
研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平
已经有15人回复
-
真的好想读博！
已经有19人回复
-
如何分离原料与产品
已经有12人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有15人回复
-
环肽的合成
已经有5人回复
-
学硕专硕
已经有5人回复
-
0854－0855调剂
已经有12人回复
-
with editor 两个月了，什么原因？
已经有15人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有48人回复
12楼2019-12-06 15:06:42
5