| 查看: 4927 | 回复: 15 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
ceramics international已有9人参与
|
|||
|
最近在ceramics international上投了一篇文章，经过一次大修后审稿人认为再次修改后可以接收，修完稿后编辑认为内容已经达到要求，语言存在问题需要进行润色，在我润色完后提交后，编辑直接reject，要求重新投稿，昨天晚上到现在一直是with editor,请各位大神帮我分析分析这是怎么回事？ （第二次审稿意见）The reviewer has commented on your above paper and indicated that it is acceptable for publication with some corrections. I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript carefully addressing the issues raised in the reviewer's comments (included below). Although the scientuific content of the revised paper may be acceptable, language needs to be revised as before advisd to authors. Just two examples from abstract: "The aim of this examination was to discuss.." shall be "The aim of this paper is to discuss".. "as well as an increase in resistant hydrothermal stability with" shall be "as well as an increase in hydrothermal stability with" Authors are again advised to have their paper fully revised for language by an official technical editing agency. （第三次审稿意见）Language has been revised. Now please resubmit the whole revised paper as a new submission without showing corrections in colour. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
with editor 两个月了，什么原因？
已经有16人回复
-
普通院校药学硕士，做合成的，感觉找不到工作
已经有17人回复
-
如何分离原料与产品
已经有13人回复
-
LWT投
已经有3人回复
-
真的好想读博！
已经有22人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有49人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有16人回复
-
没学上
已经有12人回复
-
研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平
已经有15人回复
-
环肽的合成
已经有5人回复
7楼2018-12-08 09:38:58
8楼2018-12-08 09:39:18
10楼2018-12-08 14:13:47
5