24小时热门版块排行榜 | 石溪大学接受考研调剂申请> |
该期刊扩展资料,欢迎小木虫资深虫友来补充。一起完善,供大家参考。为了保证质量,目前只有金币大于50个的虫子可以参与期刊点评。 |
SCI期刊名: |
Studies in Science Education
STUD SCI EDUC
|
我要投此期刊 |
出版周期: | ||
出版ISSN: | 0305-7267 | |
通讯方式: | ||
期刊主页网址: | https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rsse20/current | |
在线投稿网址: |
偏重的研究方向: | - |
投稿录用比例: | 0% (计算公式:参与点评网友投稿录用人数/总点评网友人数×100%) |
审稿速度: | -(非官方数据) |
审稿费用: | -(非官方数据) |
版面费用: | -(非官方数据) |
Aims and scope 2017 Impact Factor 3.455 Ranking: 9/238 (Education & Educational Research), 3/41 (Education, Scientific Disciplines) © 2018 Thomson Reuters, 2017 Journal Citation Reports® 2017 Citescore 4.00 - values from Scopus The central aim of Studies in Science Education is to publish review articles of the highest quality which provide analytical syntheses of research into key topics and issues in science education. In addressing this aim, the Editor and Editorial Advisory Board, are guided by a commitment to: publishing articles which serve both to consolidate and reflect upon existing fields of study and to promote new areas for research activity. Studies in Science Education will be of interest to all those involved in science education including: science education researchers, doctoral and masters students; science teachers at elementary, high school and university levels; science education policy makers; science education curriculum developers and text book writers. Articles featured in Studies in Science Education have been made available either following invitation from the Editor or through potential contributors offering pieces. Given the substantial nature of the review articles, the Editor is willing to give informal feedback on the suitability of proposals though all contributions, whether invited or not, are subject to full peer review. A limited number of books of special interest and concern to those involved in science education are normally reviewed in each volume. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two anonymous referees. |