CyRhmU.jpeg
²é¿´: 1539  |  »Ø¸´: 4
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

ĽÒàÄý

ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

[½»Á÷] ¡¾ÍâÓïѧϰ¡¿È¤Î¶Ó¢ÓïÖ®ÂÛÓѧ¶ø12£©--47ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë

¡¾ÍâÓïѧϰ¡¿È¤Î¶Ó¢ÓïÖ®ÂÛÓï¹²ÉÍ  Reading of Fun Stuff Confucian Analects 47th



ÂÛÓï--ÎÒ˼¹ÊÎÒÔÚ
ѧ¶øÆª(12)
ÓÐ×ÓÔ»£º¡°¶YÖ®Ó㬺͞éÙF¡£ÏÈÍõÖ®µÀ˹žéÃÀ£¬Ð¡´óÓÉÖ®¡£ÓÐËù²»ÐУ¬ÖªºÍ¶øºÍ£¬²»ÒÔ¶Y¹?Ö®£¬Ò಻¿ÉÐÐÒ²¡£¡±
¡¡¡¡¡¾Ô­ÎÄ¡¿
¡¡¡¡ÓÐ×ÓÔ»£º¡°ÀñÖ®Óâ٣¬ºÍΪ¹ó¢Ú¡£ÏÈÍõÖ®µÀ£¬Ë¹ÎªÃÀ¢Û¡£Ð¡´óÓÉÖ®¢Ü¡£ÓÐËù²»ÐТݣ¬ÖªºÍ¶øºÍ¢Þ£¬²»ÒÔÀñ½ÚÖ®¢ß£¬Ò಻¿ÉÐÐÒ²¡£¡±
¡¡¡¡¡¾½ñÒë¡¿
¡¡¡¡ÓÐ×Ó˵£º¡°ÀñµÄ×÷Óã¬ÒÔ×öµ½ºÍгΪ¿É¹ó¡£¹Å´úÏÈÍõÖιúµÄÔ­Ôò£¬¿É¹óÖ®´¦¾ÍÔÚÕâÀСÊ´óʶ¼°´Õâ¸öÔ­ÔòÈ¥×ö¡£Èç¹ûÓеĵط½Ðв»Í¨£¬Ö»ÖªµÀΪºÍг¶øºÍг£¬²»ÓÃÀñÀ´½ÚÖÆºÍÔ¼Êø£¬ËùÒÔ¾ÍÐв»Í¨ÁË¡£¡±
¡¡¡¡¡¾×¢ÊÍ¡¿
¡¡¡¡¢ÙÀñ£ºÌåÏÖ¡°ÈÊ¡°µÄ¸÷ÖÖ¹æÔò¡£Óãº×÷Ó㬹¦ÓᣢںÍΪ¹ó£ºÓöÊÂÒÔºÍгΪ¿É¹ó¡£ºÍ£ººÍг£¬Ð­µ÷¡£¢ÛÏÈÍõ£ºÖ¸ÖÜÎÄÍõµÈ¹Å´úÏÍÍõ¡£Ë¹£ºÕâ¸ö£¬Ö¸Ê¾´ú´Ê£¬Ö¸´ú¡°ºÍΪ¹ó¡± ¢ÜС´óÓÉÖ®£ºÐ¡Ê¡¢´óʶ¼ÒÔ¡°ºÍΪ¹ó¡±Îª³ö·¢µã£¬°´Õâ¸öÔ­ÔòÈ¥×ö¡£ÓÉ£º·îÐУ¬ÕÕ×ö¡£¢ÝËù²»ÐУºÃû´ÊÐÔ´Ê×飬×÷¾äÖС°ÓС±µÄ±öÓÒâ˼˵¡°Ðв»Í¨Ö®´¦¡±¡£¢ÞÖª£ºÎªÁË¡£¢ß½Ú£º½ÚÖÆ£¬Ô¼Êø¡£Ö®£º±öÓï´ú´Ê£¬ÕâÑù£¬Õâ¸ö¡£
In ceremonies a natural ease is to be prized, and yet to be subordinate to the end of ceremonies, -- the reverential observance of propriety.
The philosopher You said, "In practicing the rules of propriety, a natural ease is to be prized. In the ways prescribed by the ancient kings, this is the excellent quality, and in things small and great we follow them. Yet it is not to be observed in all cases. If one, knowing how such ease should be prized, manifests it, without regulating it by the rules of propriety, this likewise is not to be done."
¡¾ÆÀµã¡¿
¡¡¡¡±¾ÕÂÂÛÊö¡°ÒÔºÍΪ¹ó¡±ºÍ¡°ÒÔÀñ½ÚºÍ¡±µÄ˼Ïë¡£
¡¡¡¡Àñ£¬¿××ÓÈÏΪÒÔÖ®¡°¾­¹ú¼Ò¡±ÎªÕþÖÆ£¬ÒÔÖ®¡°ÐòÃñÈË¡±ÎªÀñÖÆ¡¢ÀñÒÇ¡£ÀñÊÇÈÊÒåµÄ¹æ·¶£¬ÖƶȻ¯¡£ÀñµÄÖ÷Òª×÷ÓÃÊÇÇø±ð¡¢Î¬»¤Ç×Êè¡¢¹ó¼úµÄ¼ÈºÍºÏÓֵȼ¶ÏÞ¶¨µÄÖÈÐò¡£ºÍºÏÊÇÄ¿µÄ£¬Î¬»¤ÑªÔµ¹ØÏµµÄÂ׳£´ÎÐòºÍÉç»áÕþÖιØÏµµÄµÈ¼¶ÖÈÐò£¬ÔòÊÇ´ïµ½ºÍºÏµÄÊֶΡ£
¡¡¡¡ÎÒÃǵÄÏÈÈ˺ÜÔç¾ÍÈÏʶµ½¡°È˺͡±ÔÚÉç»á»î¶¯ÖеÄÖØÒª×÷Óá£È˺ÍÍòÊÂÐË¡£È˺ÍÌìÏÂÄþ¡£¾Í½ñÌìÀ´¿´£¬È˺ÍÊ¹×æ¹úÐÀÐÀÏòÈÙ¡£ÈËÐĺÍ˳£¬¹ØÏµ¾Í»áÈÚÇ¢£¬¾Í»á»¥Ïà¹ØÐÄ£¬»¥Ïà°ïÖú£¬´ÏÃ÷²ÅÖǵÃÒÔ³ä·Ö·¢»Ó¡£·ñÔò£¬È˻ᵽ´¦Åö±Ú£¬¼ÒÍ¥»áʧȥÎÂů£¬Ãñ×å»á£¬¹ú¼Ò»á¡£¿É¼û¡°ºÍΪ¹ó¡±È·ÊµÖÁÀíÃûÑÔ¡£
¡¡¡¡ÈçºÎ×öµ½È˺ÍÄØ£¿Ò»ÒªÐĺͣ¬´Ó¡°ÐÄÍùÒ»´¦Ï롱µ½¡°¾¢ÍùÒ»´¦Ê¹¡±£¬ÍŽá·Ü½ø¡£¶þ½²È˺ͣ¬²»ÊÇÎÞÔ­ÔòµÄÍËÈã¬Í×Э±ØÐëÓÃÀñ¼ÓÒÔ½ÚÖÆ£¬¼´¡°²»ÒÔÀñ½ÚÖ®£¬Ò಻¿ÉÐÐÒ²¡£¡±


ËæÊÖÌùͼϵÁÐÖ® ÉíÌåÓ¢Óï˵

Å©ÀúÐÂÄêÒѾ­Ô¶È¥ÁË£¬´ó¼ÒÓ¦¸ÃÔÚÒѾ­¹¤×÷»òÕß±¼¸°Ñ§Ð£µÄ·ÉÏÁ˰ɣ¬Ð¡±à¾ÍÎÊÒ»ÎÊ´ó¼Ò¶ÇƤÉϵÄÈ⻹ºÃÂð£¿Ã¿·ê¼Ñ½ÚÅÖÈý½ïûÓУ¿·²ÊǻشðûÓеÄÖÐÎç¼ÇµÃ¶à³ÔÁ½Íë·¹£¡
À´Ò»ÆªÕð¾ªÑÛÇòµÄÑо¿ÐÂÎŰÉ
Ó¢¹úÓÖ³öÀ×ÈËÑо¿À²£¡Ò»ÏîÓÉÊ¥°²µÂ³˹´óѧ£¨»¦½­Ð¡±à£º°ËØÔһϣ¬¾ÍÊÇÍþÁ®Íõ×ÓÄîµÄ´óѧŶ£¡£©×éÖ¯Ñо¿µÄʵÑéÖ¤Ã÷£º´óÁ³µÄÄÐÈË±ÈÆðСÁ³ÄÐÈ˸ü²»¿ÉÐÅ¡£ÓÚÊǸù¾ÝÕâ¸öÑо¿ÎÒÃÇ¿ÉÒԵóö½áÂÛ£ºÉÏͼÖеÄ×ó±ßµÄSimon Cowell£¨ÃÀ¹úżÏñÀïµÄ¶¾É߯ÀÅУ©Òª±ÈÓұߵÄDavid Tennant£¨ÔøÔÚ¡¶¹þÀû¡¤²¨ÌØÓë»ðÑæ±­¡·ÖгöÑÝ·´ÅɽÇɫС°ÍÌᡤ¿ËÀÍÆæ£¬ÏëÆðÀ´ÁËÂ𣿣©¼éÕ©¡£

¡¡¡¡Men with wider faces 'less trustworthy'
¡¡¡¡The findings suggest that David Tennant could be trusted more than Simon Cowell.
¡¡¡¡A team of psychologists at the University of St Andrews invited men to play a computerised game for money. The game offered players opportunities to trust other participants, but also opportunities to exploit them.
¡¡¡¡During the game a participant was shown an expressionless photo of a fellow player's face at the start of each game.
¡¡¡¡The participant had then to decide whether to take an immediate pay-off or entrust the money to the person they saw - who, in turn, could decide either to co-operate, and help both players make more money, or take the cash and run.
¡¡¡¡Lead researcher Michael Stirrat set up the games to investigate whether he could find any measurable relationship between perceptions of trustworthiness from perceptions and behaviour.
¡¡¡¡He found that participants were more likely to entrust money to men with narrower faces.
¡¡¡¡"We all make instant judgements about strangers - whether to trust him or whether to be wary of her. In my research I have been trying to find a basis for these intuitive judgements," said Mr Stirrat.
¡¡¡¡"From the evolutionary theory of sexual selection we predicted that male faces may signal physical dominance and that more dominant men would be more likely to be exploitative because they can be.
¡¡¡¡"We found that men with wider faces exploited trust more often to make money for themselves."
¡¡¡¡However, Mr Stirrat concludes with a word of caution:"The results are important but we shouldn't leap to the conclusion that wider-faced men are bad. They were exploitative in our games, but in other games the wider faced men were more likely to sacrifice their money to enforce good behaviour.
¡¡¡¡"This is ongoing research and it is difficult to draw any conclusions yet, but what is certainly true is that wider faced, more robust men have the capacity to choose to be society's criminals or society's police."
¹þ¹þ¹þ¹þ£¬¿´µ½ÕâÆªÎÄÕµÄÄÐÉúÃDz»ÖªÐÄÀíÒõÓ°Óжà´ó£¿»¹ºÃÎÒÊÇÅ®Éú~~
ÕâÁ½Ìì¿´µ½³¬¿É°®µÄͼ£¬·ÅÉÏÀ´Ò»ÆðÐÀÉÍ

´ó¼ÒÔÚѧӢÓïµÄ·ÉÏ»¹»á×ߵĸüÔ¶µÄ£¬ÍâÓï°æ»áÒ»Ö±ÓëÄãͬÔÚ¡£¼á³Ö£¬¼ÓÓÍ~~

   
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
There is one among those stars that guides my life through the dark unknow.
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

³¤·çÁ÷ÔÂ

½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Ëͺ컨һ¶ä
ÖÕÓÚ¸üÐÂÀ²£¬ÅÖÁËûÓУ¬ÄóÒ»ÏÂ

·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë
3Â¥2016-02-20 16:13:22
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 5 ¸ö»Ø´ð

will_

ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Ëͺ컨һ¶ä
In practicing the rules of propriety, a natural ease is to be prized.

×ß°¡×ß
You are being watched.
2Â¥2016-02-20 12:37:14
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

ĽÒàÄý

ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

ÒýÓûØÌû:
2Â¥: Originally posted by will_ at 2016-02-20 12:37:14
In practicing the rules of propriety, a natural ease is to be prized.

×ß°¡×ß

4Â¥2016-02-20 16:28:46
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

ĽÒàÄý

ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

ÒýÓûØÌû:
3Â¥: Originally posted by ³¤·çÁ÷Ô at 2016-02-20 16:13:22
ÖÕÓÚ¸üÐÂÀ²£¬ÅÖÁËûÓУ¬ÄóÒ»ÏÂ

û³Æ¹ý£¬²»ÖªµÀ
There is one among those stars that guides my life through the dark unknow.
5Â¥2016-02-20 16:29:25
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û