| 查看: 1973 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 二飞~~~ 的 4 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
二飞~~~新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[交流]
模糊数学方向的硕士论文投哪个sci杂志容易中?
|
||
| 投了一次Fuzzy sets and systems已经被拒，请问大神们有什么好的意见？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。
已经有4人回复
-
真诚求助：手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心，有什么渠道能发核心吗
已经有6人回复
-
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有14人回复
-
三甲基碘化亚砜的氧化反应
已经有4人回复
-
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢
已经有5人回复
-
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗
已经有5人回复
-
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
-
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
-
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
-
AI论文写作工具：是科研加速器还是学术作弊器？
已经有3人回复
二飞~~~
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 13
- 散金: 6
- 帖子: 14
- 在线: 20.9小时
- 虫号: 3013996
- 注册: 2014-03-03
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 数理逻辑和与计算机相关的
12楼2016-01-12 11:08:14
二飞~~~
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 13
- 散金: 6
- 帖子: 14
- 在线: 20.9小时
- 虫号: 3013996
- 注册: 2014-03-03
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 数理逻辑和与计算机相关的
2楼2016-01-07 19:25:13
3楼2016-01-07 19:49:35
二飞~~~
新虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 13
- 散金: 6
- 帖子: 14
- 在线: 20.9小时
- 虫号: 3013996
- 注册: 2014-03-03
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 数理逻辑和与计算机相关的
|
投稿一个月被拒的，我搜了不知道哪个好中，导师想让投sci，我觉得差不多就行了，这是被拒理由，Reviewers' comments: Please rate the following criteria using only one of the five following words: BAD, WEAK, FAIR, GOOD, EXCELLENT a) Relevance to Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Good b) Originality: Fair c) Significance; usefulness: Fair d) Technical soundness: Weak e) Reference to the related literature: Weak f) Presentation: Weak g) Linguistic quality: Good See attached report Reviewer #2: Dear authors, most of your propositions are based on Lemma 2.2, that is actually a very good and interesting result. Unfortunately, its proof is not presented in the submission, and it can only be found on an accepted (but not published) paper, written in Chinese. If you don't provide a proof of that Lemma, the reader will never be able to assess if your results are correct or not. Other comments: 1 - the paper needs a drastic English revision. It is barely understandable. 2 - the notations you propose are very confusing and not really adapted to the standard literature. Sometimes they change, sometimes are not introduces. 3 - why you only consider the minimum and the Lukasiewicsz t-norms? 4 - It is hard to see the scientific relevance of your proposal. Try to state clearly what is the objective of your paper. |
4楼2016-01-07 20:16:07