| 查看: 2377 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
您好，我想咨询下，气相方法学验证以及液相方法学验证线性与范围... 已有4人参与
|
|||
|
您好，我想咨询下，气相方法学验证以及液相方法学验证线性与范围，范围一般在多少 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
全日制（定向）博士
已经有5人回复
-
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有10人回复
-
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法，现在跑or等等看？
已经有4人回复
-
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
-
参与限项
已经有3人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有4人回复
-
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有12人回复
-
所感
已经有4人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有7人回复
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
CDE审评四部 黄晓龙 摘要：本文介绍了在对有关物质检查所用的分析方法进行方法学验证时，各项指标的可接受标准，以利于判断该分析方法的可行性。 关键词：有关物质检查 分析方法验证 可接收标准 药品中的有关物质泛指在药品的生产与储存过程中产生的工艺杂质或降解产物。由于这些有关物质的存在会影响到药品的纯度，进而可能会产生毒副作用，所以有关物质的控制是药品研发的一个重要方面，也是我们在药品审评中一直重点关注的要点之一。而要对有关物质进行严格的控制，就离不开专属性强、灵敏度高的分析方法，这就涉及到分析方法的筛选与验证。从现有的申报资料看，药品研发单位已基本上意识到分析方法验证的重要性，但是对验证时各具体指标是否可行尚没有一个明确的可接受标准，从而难以对验证结果进行评判。为解决这一问题，本文结合国外一些大型药品研发企业在此方面的要求，提出了在对有关物质检查方法进行验证时的可接受标准，供国内的药品研发单位在进行研究时参考。 1．准确度 该指标主要是通过回收率来反映。验证时一般要求根据有关物质的定量限与质量标准中该杂质的限度分别配制三个浓度的供试品溶液各三份（例如某杂质的限度为0.2%，则可分别配制该杂质浓度为0.1％、0.2％和0.3％的杂质溶液），分别测定其含量，将实测值与理论值比较，计算回收率，并计算9个回收率数据的相对标准差（RSD）。 该项目的可接受的标准为：各浓度下的平均回收率均应在80%-120%之间，如杂质的浓度为定量限，则该浓度下的平均回收率可放宽至70%-130%，相对标准差应不大于10%。 2．线性 线性一般通过线性回归方程的形式来表示。具体的验证方法为： 在定量限至一定的浓度范围内配制6份浓度不同的供试液，分别测定该杂质峰的面积，计算相应的含量。以含量为横坐标（X），峰面积为纵坐标（Y），进行线性回归分析。 可接受的标准为：回归线的相关系数（R）不得小于0.990，Y轴截距应在100％响应值的25％以内，响应因子的相对标准差应不大于10%。 3．精密度 1）重复性 配制6份杂质浓度（一般为0.1%）相同的供试品溶液，由一个分析人员在尽可能相同的条件下进行测试，所得6份供试液含量的相对标准差应不大于15%。 2）中间精密度 配制6份杂质浓度（一般为0.1%）相同的供试品溶液，分别由两个分析人员使用不同的仪器与试剂进行测试，所得12个含量数据的相对标准差应不大于20%。 4．专属性 可接受的标准为：空白对照应无干扰，该杂质峰与其它峰应能完全分离，分离度不得小于2.0。 5．检测限 杂质峰与噪音峰信号的强度比应不得小于3。 6．定量限 杂质峰与噪音峰信号的强度比应不得小于10。另外，配制6份最低定量限浓度的溶液，所测6份溶液杂质峰保留时间的相对标准差应不大于2.0%，峰面积的相对标准差应不大于5.0%。 7．耐用性 分别考察流动相比例变化±5％、流动相pH值变化±0.2、柱温变化±5℃、检测波长变化±5nm、流速相对值变化±20％以及采用三根不同批号的色谱柱进行测定时，仪器色谱行为的变化，每个条件下各测试两次。可接受的标准为：各杂质峰的拖尾因子不得大于2.0，杂质峰与其他成分峰必须达到基线分离；各条件下的杂质含量数据（n=6）的相对标准差应不大于2.0%，杂质含量的绝对值在±0.1％以内。 8、系统适应性 配制6份相同浓度的杂质溶液进行分析，该杂质峰峰面积的相对标准差应不大于2.0%，保留时间的相对标准差应不大于1.0%。另外，杂质峰的拖尾因子不得大于2.0，理论塔板数应符合质量标准的规定。 9．溶液稳定性 按照分析方法分别配置对照品溶液与供试品溶液，平行测定两次主成分与杂质的含量，然后将上述溶液分别贮存在室温与冰箱冷藏室（4℃）中，在1、2、3、5和7天时分别平行测定两次主成分与杂质的含量。 可接受的标准为：主成分的含量变化的绝对值应不大于2.0%，杂质含量的绝对值在±0.1％以内，并不得出现新的大于报告限度的杂质。 |
14楼2016-01-05 14:20:55
zongyuan
捐助贵宾 (知名作家)
- 应助: 304 (大学生)
- 金币: 4637.7
- 散金: 2225
- 红花: 61
- 帖子: 8282
- 在线: 823小时
- 虫号: 766948
- 注册: 2009-05-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药物分析
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
|
Determination of Linearity and Range—Linearity should be established across the range of the analytical procedure. It should be established initially by visual examination of a plot of signals as a function of analyte concentration of content. If there appears to be a linear relationship, test results should be established by appropriate statistical methods (e.g., by calculation of a regression line by the method of least squares). Data from the regression line itself may be helpful to provide mathematical estimates of the degree of linearity. The correlation coefficient, y-intercept, slope of the regression line, and residual sum of squares should be submitted. The range of the procedure is validated by verifying that the analytical procedure provides acceptable precision, accuracy, and linearity when applied to samples containing analyte at the extremes of the range as well as within the range. ICH recommends that, for the establishment of linearity, a minimum of five concentrations normally be used. It is also recommended that the following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Assay of a Drug Substance (or a finished product): from 80% to 120% of the test concentration. Determination of an Impurity: from 50% to 120% of the acceptance criterion. For Content Uniformity: a minimum of 70% to 130% of the test concentration, unless a wider or more appropriate range based on the nature of the dosage form (e.g., metered-dose inhalers) is justified. For Dissolution Testing: ±20% over the specified range (e.g., if the acceptance criteria for a controlled-release product cover a region from 30%, after 1 hour, and up to 90%, after 24 hours, the validated range would be 10% to 110% of the label claim). The traditional definition of linearity, i.e., the establishment of a linear or mathematical relationship between sample concentration and response, is not applicable to particle size analysis. For particle size analysis, a concentration range is defined (instrument- and particle size-dependent) such that the measured particle size distribution is not affected by changes in concentration within the defined concentration range. Concentrations below the defined concentration range may introduce an error due to poor signal-to-noise ratio, and concentrations exceeding the defined concentration range may introduce an error due to multiple scattering. |
2楼2016-01-03 12:54:10
木易十日十月
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 108 (高中生)
- 金币: 1718.9
- 散金: 1250
- 红花: 31
- 帖子: 1681
- 在线: 339.5小时
- 虫号: 3327934
- 注册: 2014-07-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 色谱分析
4楼2016-01-03 12:56:52
zongyuan
捐助贵宾 (知名作家)
- 应助: 304 (大学生)
- 金币: 4637.7
- 散金: 2225
- 红花: 61
- 帖子: 8282
- 在线: 823小时
- 虫号: 766948
- 注册: 2009-05-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 药物分析
【答案】应助回帖
|
3. RANGE The specified range is normally derived from linearity studies and depends on the intended application of the procedure. It is established by confirming that the analytical procedure provides an acceptable degree of linearity, accuracy and precision when applied to samples containing amounts of analyte within or at the extremes of the specified range of the analytical procedure. The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: - for the assay of a drug substance or a finished (drug) product: normally from 80 to 120 percent of the test concentration; - for content uniformity, covering a minimum of 70 to 130 percent of the test concentration, unless a wider more appropriate range, based on the nature of the dosage form (e.g., metered dose inhalers), is justified; - for dissolution testing: +/-20 % over the specified range; e.g., if the specifications for a controlled released product cover a region from 20%, after 1 hour, up to 90%, after 24 hours, the validated range would be 0-110% of the label claim for the determination of an impurity: from the reporting level of an impurity1 to 120% of the specification; - for impurities known to be unusually potent or to produce toxic or unexpected pharmacological effects, the detection/quantitation limit should be commensurate with the level at which the impurities must be controlled; Note: for validation of impurity test procedures carried out during development, it may be necessary to consider the range around a suggested (probable) limit. - if assay and purity are performed together as one test and only a 100% standard is used, linearity should cover the range from the reporting level of the impurities1 to 120% of the assay specification. |
5楼2016-01-03 12:58:30