24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3263  |  回复: 34
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xuxiaodai

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

[求助] 求助Chem Commun 审稿被拒,这种情况下重投还有希望么 已有4人参与

Chem Commun 审稿被编辑拒掉,不知现在是不是系统更改了,没有显示大小修之类,有个rating项。想问下有遇到这种情况的么,这种情况下重投还有希望么。还有就是,如果转投到JMCA的话是否需要附上审稿意见?做的内容是MOFs衍生碳材料的应用。审稿意见如下:
Thank you for your submission to ChemComm, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. I sent your manuscript to reviewers and I have now received their reports which are copied below.
After careful evaluation of the manuscript and reviewers’ comments, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication and therefore it has been rejected from ChemComm. A research manuscript in ChemComm must report high quality, new work which makes a significant contribution to the field and is of interest to a general chemistry audience. As a result, in addition to the quality of the science, the referees are asked to judge the significance and likely impact of the work presented. On balance, the referees of your manuscript have indicated that the work described therein is of specialist interest and routine significance and thus its impact is unsuitable for the wide readership of ChemComm. The work may be better suited to publication in a more specialised journal after the concerns of the referees have been addressed in full. Please note that the acceptance rate for ChemComm is <35% of submitted manuscripts.
I am sorry not to have better news for you, however, thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. I wish you every success publishing this manuscript elsewhere.

R#1:
Rating: Significant - specialist interest

R#2:
Rating: Routine
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xuxiaodai

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
21楼: Originally posted by chavid at 2015-10-30 14:18:18
想要投JMCA的话,你还是得把CC的审稿意见回复了。因为RSC都是这样,要把以前投过的RSC的期刊写上并且把审稿意见及回答都要附上。

恩。我不打算转投JMC了。投过CC再投JMCA,我怕送审的机会都没有
22楼2015-10-30 15:32:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 35 个回答

hqzhou0817

金虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
这样的话,估计重投也没戏,两个审稿人意见太负面了。我当时有一篇是编辑拒稿鼓励重投的,做了很大的修改来恢复审稿人的意见。

除非你做了很大的改动,而且足够应付审稿人的意见,写出让编辑回心转意的cover letter.
海纳百川,有容乃大。壁立千仞,无欲则刚!
2楼2015-10-29 23:00:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xuxiaodai

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by hqzhou0817 at 2015-10-29 23:00:24
这样的话,估计重投也没戏,两个审稿人意见太负面了。我当时有一篇是编辑拒稿鼓励重投的,做了很大的修改来恢复审稿人的意见。

除非你做了很大的改动,而且足够应付审稿人的意见,写出让编辑回心转意的cover let ...

第一个审稿人的rating还是很正面的吧?我从字面上看~  第二个就说了不是很novel  然后提了几个问题。。 不知如果转投JMCA是否需要说明在CC投稿
3楼2015-10-29 23:04:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

独步青云

新虫 (职业作家)

术中小生

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
同意楼上所说,还是转投其他期刊

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2015-10-29 23:05:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见