24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2432  |  回复: 35
当前主题已经存档。

zjults

铜虫 (小有名气)

我也催过,我已经有一个审稿意见了,毕竟前面通过了编辑的初审。
11楼2008-10-13 15:08:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjults

铜虫 (小有名气)

grandma's 要等到什么时候呢?
12楼2008-11-05 14:31:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjults

铜虫 (小有名气)

终于什完了
13楼2008-12-04 14:22:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chougao

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by zjults at 2008-12-4 14:22:
终于什完了

中了没?
14楼2008-12-04 14:48:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjults

铜虫 (小有名气)

只是 Required revies completed
15楼2008-12-04 14:50:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

4sn

金虫 (小有名气)

我投过A,很快,1个月多一点,给拒了...

所以,慢是好事

好运
16楼2008-12-04 14:54:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjults

铜虫 (小有名气)

谢谢你的吉言
17楼2008-12-04 15:37:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjults

铜虫 (小有名气)

据了,不过经过抗辩和解释得到一个修改的机会. 编辑回信如下:
Dear xxx,

I have discussed the case of your manuscript and its evaluation with the leadership of Physica D. I also emphasized that the example you sent me informally gives me the impression that your point may be valid and correct. Still, we must recognize the fact that the reviewers were respected members of the community, even you referred to some of them in your manuscript. All this means that those prospective readers of the journal who are familiar with the subject could not understand the main message of your paper - and this is not necessarily their fault.

I can offer the following solution. You will be allowed to re-submit your fully re-written manuscript via a special "rebuttal" procedure. You will receive detailed information on this through the elsevier editorial system soon. Please, take into account the comments of Reviewers #1 and #2 in the sense that try to help the readers to avoid similarly false conclusuions based on your work. Take special care for introducing your idea in a simple, short, but still understandable way - just like you did with the simple example in your informal email to me. Also, emphasize your basic idea in the abstract and also in the Conclsuions clearly. You may also have to ask for help regarding language problems.

Also, please accept the fact that the special procedure you are allowed to use does not mean that your paper will be accepted - it is still pending, and apart of its scientific value it must be well written, too, in order to achieve an efficient way of information and knowledge transmission within the community. It is not easy to publish in PhysD, authors may complain about the rigorous requirements and reviews, but the established rank of the journal certifies the strict policy of the editorial board.

With best regards,
xxx
18楼2008-12-29 10:33:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sxy5306

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

physcia B
很快
从投稿到接受1个月多些
19楼2008-12-31 22:08:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chougao

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by zjults at 2008-12-29 10:33:
据了,不过经过抗辩和解释得到一个修改的机会. 编辑回信如下:
Dear xxx,

I have discussed the case of your manuscript and its evaluation with the leadership of Physica D. I also emphasized that the ...

呵呵,任重道远,physica d还是比较难搞定的。
20楼2008-12-31 22:16:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zjults 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见