24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

stone1235617

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 7 (幼儿园)
金币: 2526.5
帖子: 631
在线: 754.9小时
虫号: 738191

[交流] PRL编辑的第一段话是什么意思？

编辑的意见，最后一句话是什么意思，倾向于接收还是不接收呢？
The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referees.
The resulting reports include a critique which is sufficiently adverse
that we cannot accept your paper on the basis of material now at hand.
We append pertinent comments. We do not consider the referee's
arguments in the first paragraph of their report to be particularly
convincing as to the suitability of your manuscript for PRL.

第一个审稿人
In their paper, the authors study the  *****. The paper uses
a combination of numerics, and a  self-consistent Born approximation
that is strongly based on the  discussion of Ref. 21, to *****
. I find the paper nicely written, and  believe the results to be sound.
I would, however, recommend publication in a more specialized journal,
such as the Physical Review B, after the points listed below have been
addressed by the authors.

第二个审稿人
In this manuscript, the authors discuss ******. Their findings seem valid
and are  well presented. In my opinion their findings carry enough significance
and would be of interest to a diverse community. Therefore I recommend
the manuscript to be published in PRL.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

APL Materials是绝地反击，还是垂死挣扎？我们拭目以待。已经有65人回复
我那苦逼的生物学屌丝逆袭之路（二）已经有0人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2015-08-25 11:05:43

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

stone1235617

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 7 (幼儿园)
金币: 2526.5
帖子: 631
在线: 754.9小时
虫号: 738191

引用回帖:

12楼: Originally posted by pjstang at 2015-08-25 12:23:49
拒搞

不像是据稿。因为跟了第二段

If you feel that you can overcome or refute the criticism, you may
resubmit to Physical Review Letters. If you resubmit to PRL, we are
likely to seek the advice of new referees and/or the old referees if
available. With any resubmittal, please include a summary of changes
made and a brief response to all recommendations and criticisms.

到底是第一个referee的第一段不convincing 还是第二个referee的第一段不
convincing 呢？