24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 603  |  回复: 3
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者cumtblue将赠送您 5 个金币

cumtblue

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 已经reject了,看看有没有必要修改再投,还是改投其他的杂志,第一次投elsevier期刊 已有1人参与

Reviewer's comments on your work have now been received. You will see that he/she is advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.
For your guidance, the reviewer's comments are appended below.
We would like to thank you for submitting your paper to the journal and we are sorry it cannot be published. We would be willing to reconsider the paper if it undergoes a thorough reworking and the advised modifications are carried out. The paper would be handled then as a new submission.

Reviewers' comments:
Reviewer #1: The paper is not acceptable for publication in S&A. It needs experimental verification, only then it could be considered.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

newtowner

金虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2015-07-28 21:59:31
缺少实验验证。你都没做实验,一个光杆文章就投啊。
补充实验后重投,投其他的都可以
2楼2015-07-28 18:44:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3楼2015-07-28 18:56:15
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

cumtblue

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by newtowner at 2015-07-28 18:44:45
缺少实验验证。你都没做实验,一个光杆文章就投啊。
补充实验后重投,投其他的都可以

谢谢
4楼2015-08-03 22:58:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 cumtblue 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见