24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2015  |  回复: 5
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者心随意动将赠送您 10 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

心随意动

木虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 求助审稿人意见,很纠结! 已有2人参与

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are attached and copied below. The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.

However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a revised manuscript that includes such data and analysis (assuming no related data is published in the interim). This revision should address the reviewers’ comments and include a point-by-point response to the concerns.

To revise your manuscript, log into ACS Paragon Plus at https://paragonplus.acs.org/login and select "My Authoring Activity". There you will find your manuscript title listed under "Expired Revisions and Manuscripts No Longer Under Consideration." With the exception of your main text file, all of your original files will be available to you for review or replacement during the resubmission process. If you need to replace a file, please be sure to remove the original before uploading a new one. In all circumstances you must upload a new manuscript text file.

When submitting your resubmitted manuscript through ACS Paragon Plus, you will be able to respond to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the text box provided or by attaching a file containing your detailed responses to all of the points raised by the reviewers.

Prior to submitting the manuscript, ensure that the manuscript addresses the following point:

Supporting Information:
(1) Supporting Information requires a cover page including title, author list, author affiliations, and corresponding author's email as in the manuscript.

At your option you can provide a graphic for the Table of Contents.  For information on this, please read our Guidelines for Table of Contents/Abstract Graphics (https://pubs.acs.org/paragonplus ... cs_guidelines.pdf).

With sincere regards,

Benny D. Freeman
Associate Editor
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research

这是编辑意见。还有两个两个审稿人的意见,第一个的问题比较难回答,第二个就单词和小问题了,不难。
1、求助编辑这是拒稿还是怎么着。
2、是修改后重新当做新的一篇文章投吗?那编辑还是原来的编辑?审稿人呢?跟投新的文章流程一样吗?
3、还是当做修改稿投呢,但它又不是修改,修改的应该是附件中第一张图片:submit revision,而我的是第二张resubmit
实在不知道怎么办了,第一次投文章,求大牛们指教,不胜感激!

求助审稿人意见,很纠结!
1.png


求助审稿人意见,很纠结!-1
2.png
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

chdozh

木虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
编辑给你大修,需要根据referees' comments 补实验。
不知不觉转眼10年了!
5楼2015-07-22 10:24:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 6 个回答

julycie

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
一般老外拒收的话写的很明白。你这个让你打修

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2015-07-22 09:26:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

julycie

金虫 (正式写手)

老外拒收的话写的很明白。你这个让你大修

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
3楼2015-07-22 09:27:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

心随意动

木虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by julycie at 2015-07-22 09:27:30
老外拒收的话写的很明白。你这个让你大修

The reviewers have expressed serious reservations about this work that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research.
那这是什么意思呢
4楼2015-07-22 10:15:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见