24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3778)
>文献求助 (379)
>导师招生 (302)
>虫友互识 (289)
>硕博家园 (153)
>博后之家 (147)
>休闲灌水 (137)
>考博 (122)
>论文投稿 (109)
>基金申请 (83)
>招聘信息布告栏 (50)
>教师之家 (48)
>考研 (45)
>公派出国 (39)
>绿色求助(高悬赏) (37)
>找工作 (33)

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者paoying将赠送您 50 个金币

paoying

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 10 (幼儿园)
金币: 607.9
散金: 166
红花: 4
帖子: 295
在线: 235.1小时
虫号: 987874
注册: 2010-04-02
专业: 能源化工

[求助] 编辑建议楼主重投,大家帮忙看看还有戏吗

一大早就看到文章的审稿意见，整个人都不好了。两个审稿人：一个建议大修（修改意见主要是对几个计算公式、计算表解释得更详细些），另一个审稿人直接建议楼主把文章拆成两篇，分别再补充些内容。编辑建议楼主修改后重投，楼主觉得第二个审稿人让人很受伤。
编辑的意见：The reviewers agreed that this work is original but have expressed serious reservations about its publication at this stage that I don’t believe could be addressed through a standard major revision. In light of the comments received, I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in Energy & Fuels.
However, if further experimentation, analysis, and revisions allow you to address the referees concerns in full we would be happy to consider a new version submitted as a resubmission to this manuscript. Please upload a point by point response to all reviewer comments if you decide to resubmit.

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: Publish after major revisions.

Comments:
Please discuss experimental and analytical procedures in greater detail (section 2.2).

Please explain eqs. 1, 2 and 8.

Please discuss results in Tables 4 to 7 in more detail.

Please remove errors in citing and writing references.

Additional Questions:
Originality: Good

Technical Quality: Good

Clarity of Presentation: Good

Importance to Field: Good

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: Do not publish.

Comments:
The topic is very relevant.

My opinion is that this paper should be splitted into two separate papers:

First paper:
######

Second paper:
Column runs with material balances, full column and packing geometry and run details: include everything you have measured. Also if possible the original data of the column measurements as appendix. Thus the this paper would be a very top paper in the field. Most papers presenting test runs with real columns miss details which inhibit the proper simulation of the column system. This maybe often done deliberately and as such hinder the development of new simulation methods and testing of column models.
You could here make a real contribution to the field.

Were the sampling systems/sampling lines made of inert materials like sulfinert? Otherwise the analysis results will be distorted.

Safety factors: No specified in the paper.

Additional Questions:
Originality: Excellent

Technical Quality: Fair

Clarity of Presentation: Good

Importance to Field: Good

回复此楼