24小时热门版块排行榜    

汕头大学海洋科学、生物学、生物与医药等3个专业接受调剂
查看: 1493  |  回复: 5
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者xzq2701将赠送您 4 个金币

xzq2701

银虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 给位虫友帮忙看下,这样的退稿意见,修改后想重投该期刊,是否还有机会?已有2人参与

如题,下面是回复内容:
26-Mar-2015

Dear Dr ***:

It is my deciison that your manuscript is unsuitable for publication in Journal of Energetic Materials. I make allowances for the English writing of authors that are not native English speakers. However, there are so many anomalies, unexplained bits of the diagrams, and random, seemingly irrelevant words and impenetrable English that I cannot consider reproducing it in the Journal.

From the technical point of view I find the use of an ideal gas equation of state distracting and unnecessary.

For your information I attach the reviewer comments at the bottom of this email. I hope you will find them to be constructive and helpful. You are of course now free to submit the paper elsewhere should you choose to do so.

Thank you for considering Journal of Energetic Materials. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts.

Sincerely,
Professor ***
***
***@***


Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The authors answered the 13 comments. They also improved the English and made the Figures easier to read. The English is not perfect. The mathematical model using the perfect gas law is unnecessary and far from the real pressures at several tens of GPa. Of course, these ideal gas pressures are far too high, because a Gruneisen EOS must be used for a condensed phase detonation and its overdriven states. This analysis should be omitted, because the authors have good hydrodynamic calculations and pressure measurements. The experiments are new and clever and should be published eventually.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
Dear Dr Xue,
I am sorry to say that I found your paper extremely difficult to read. English requires the accurate use of definite article 'the' and the indefinite article 'a', or 'an'. These are often omitted, or used incorrectly throughout the document. This makes it difficult for a reader whose first language is English to understand what is being written. I also found many cases where you used words which I found inappropriate to the context. For example, in the abstract you write "For exploring.....a spherical shaped booster...". As far as I can see the booster is annular, although you show in Figure 6 a disk-shaped booster.

Let me try to help a little by rewriting what I think you are trying to say in the abstract.

"A Study of the Detonation Behavior of Annular Booster Pellets.
An annular-shaped booster pellet has been developed in order to study the capability of such a design to initiate the detonation of Insensitive High Explosives (IHE). The detonation characteristics of an annular booster design were studied theoretically by numerical simulation and experimentally. Results showed that if the annular booster pellet were detonated simultaneously at 4 symmetrical points detonation wave collision could be achieved within the pellet. The pairs of impacts of the 4 detonation wave-fronts generated enhanced shock pressures in 4 radially symmetric directions. These enhanced energy flow regions play a major part in improving the initiation capability of an annular booster pellet compared with a conventional cylindrical one. The convergence of the 4 detonation waves at the axis of the charge also generate an enhanced initiation capability there."

I have not had time to revise the whole of your document, but here are one or two suggestions for improvements in the sense.

Page 1, line 37; I do not understand what you mean by 'Leading to traditional.....'. The word 'Leading' is inappropriate. Perhaps the red typescript would be better phrased as follows: 'Traditional, cylindrical booster pellets have had to be modified to ensure the reliable initiation of insensitive explosives. There has been a gradual emergence of specially shaped structures [3,4], initiation mode diversification [5] and converging output energy [6,7].

A small note here is also important. You write frequently about 'initiation energy'. This concept includes no reference to the time over which the energy is delivered. If energy alone were important, it would not matter if it were delivered over a nanosecond or a year. There must be an element of time in the delivery phase as well as sufficient intensity of the stimulus. The rise time of the pressure input may be very steep, but it is not infinitely so, since the reaction zone width, while small is not infinitely so.

Page 1, line 48; the word "trend" is unnecessary here. A better wording would be '....the different sections of the detonation waveform and its associated pressure changes in the whole shock to detonation transition (SDT) were simulated. Finally, the mechanical behavior of the convergent energy in the tangential directions at the head-on collision points was studied using a steel witness plate.'

Page 2, line 32; you refer to Figure 2 where a hatched area is said to represent the booster and a shaded area is said to represent the charge. Figure 2 does not show this distinction. It merely shows the hatched area.

Page 2, line 38; I am unsure whether it is necessary for you to expand in depth the argument on plane wave reflection on a rigid boundary using the Ideal Gas Equation of State. The hydrodynamic software uses the JWL Equation of State. The answers are different and as you report, use of the Ideal Gas Equation of State gives results different from the JWL EOS as expected. May I suggest that you consider omitting the discussion using the Ideal Gas Equation of State and merely refer to the fact that using it, the results are as expected, bearing in mind that the JWL Equation of state is a more nearly exact presentation of the pressure, volume and temperature relationships than the Ideal Gas Equation of State.

Page 3, line 48; the centimeter-gram-microsecond system of units is not widely used now.

Figures 4 and 5 are quite helpful, especially the letters O, A, B, etc indicating positions and planes in the annular pellet.

However, Figure 6 suddenly refers to a solid disk, without any clear explanation why.

Figures 9 and 10 have appended to them in red an explanation which merely makes me more confused. ' In Fig. 9 and 10, is all element of the booster, is AA'B'B....etc' presumably refers to the different colored lines showing pressure as a function of time. These 2 diagrams are completely negated, since the vital key to which line represents which part of the annular booster is not shown.

I hope that you can see how difficult your document is to understand because of the inconsistencies and omissions in the diagrams and the text. As a result the casual reader would not be able to follow your arguments very easily.

There is a great deal of work which needs to be done on this paper before it is suitable for publication in The Journal of Energetic Materials. I am sorry to be so brutal, especially since I could not write a word of Mandarin or Cantonese. I have tried to be helpful and in no way wish to disparage your work.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

myownway

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
xzq2701(秋天白云代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流! 2015-03-29 18:56:47
好好改英语吧,最大的问题还是在英语

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
2楼2015-03-29 13:17:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fcxdbr421115

金虫 (正式写手)

这审稿人很细心啊,楼主英语必须要加油啦

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
做好自己,加油。
3楼2015-03-29 14:15:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xzq2701

银虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by myownway at 2015-03-29 13:17:30
好好改英语吧,最大的问题还是在英语

是啊,关键是不知道能不能再投这个期刊了?
4楼2015-03-29 18:39:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xzq2701

银虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by fcxdbr421115 at 2015-03-29 14:15:50
这审稿人很细心啊,楼主英语必须要加油啦

是啊,关键是不知道能不能再投这个期刊了?
5楼2015-03-29 18:39:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

自私的猫1988

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
编辑和审稿人都很耐心,楼主运气好
可以把文章的表述语言彻彻底底完善一下后再投该期刊
6楼2015-03-31 13:35:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xzq2701 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 294分一志愿长春理工大学物理学专业代码070200求调剂 +3 新能源科学与工� 2025-04-04 5/250 2025-04-04 23:47 by 新能源科学与工�
[考研] 211理学化学0703调剂 +6 陈橙ii 2025-03-30 6/300 2025-04-04 23:28 by 有机合成小白100
[考研] 312求调剂 +5 一只大嵩鼠 2025-03-31 5/250 2025-04-04 21:31 by Ade.
[考研] 085500数一英一283求调剂 +3 忧郁的番茄! 2025-04-02 3/150 2025-04-03 23:36 by zhq0425
[考研] 材料292调剂 +9 故人?? 2025-04-03 10/500 2025-04-03 21:39 by zikuzi1853
[考研] 求调剂(0703,化学) +7 dobodo 2025-04-01 10/500 2025-04-03 21:06 by 小小任吖
[考研] 材料294求推荐 +9 乔JOJO 2025-04-03 9/450 2025-04-03 20:49 by nanaliuyun
[考研] 求调剂 +9 蓝桉羽都 2025-04-02 10/500 2025-04-03 20:37 by asdhh1991
[考研] 337求调剂 +8 张唐雷ztl 2025-03-29 9/450 2025-04-03 15:12 by Ade.
[考研] 材料考研336分求调剂 +7 张天傲121 2025-04-02 7/350 2025-04-03 04:20 by alexanderp
[考研] 334求调剂 +3 为少66 2025-04-01 4/200 2025-04-02 16:30 by xuechenli
[考研] 340求调剂 +7 qwer123456.. 2025-04-01 7/350 2025-04-02 15:33 by lfhuang
[考研] 318求调剂 +6 不知道取什么名� 2025-03-29 6/300 2025-04-02 15:32 by lfhuang
[考研] 085602化学工程A区专硕317分求调剂 +11 照我还 2025-04-01 11/550 2025-04-02 10:49 by gqlz
[考研] 070304(物理化学)309求调剂 +7 T&J_Tom 2025-04-01 9/450 2025-04-02 09:45 by kxxmaqq
[考研] 311求调剂 +5 奉车车 2025-03-30 5/250 2025-04-01 14:20 by 1104338198
[考研] 求化工调剂 +10 清河清 2025-03-30 10/500 2025-04-01 10:12 by houyaoxu
[考研] 材料专硕调剂 +10 @茵茵.. 2025-03-29 10/500 2025-03-31 22:31 by 长春工大张老师
[考研] 一志愿华中科技大学 科目:11408 总分:340 求双一流以上调剂 可交叉 可跨 +3 saminatio 2025-03-30 3/150 2025-03-30 12:19 by ximiga713
[考研] 求调剂 +6 2734930679 2025-03-29 7/350 2025-03-30 07:30 by microscopy
信息提示
请填处理意见
婢跺秷鐦拫鍐ㄥ婢跺秷鐦拫鍐ㄥ
婢跺秷鐦拫鍐ㄥ娴滃瞼娣惍锟�閼惧嘲褰囨径宥堢槸 & 鐠嬪啫澧忛幐鍥у础閿涳拷瀵邦喕淇婇幍顐$閹碉拷
閸熷棗濮熼崥鍫滅稊閸熷棗濮熼崥鍫滅稊
閸熷棗濮熼崥鍫滅稊娴滃瞼娣惍锟�閸熷棗濮熼崥鍫滅稊閸溿劏顕�瀵邦喕淇婇幍顐$閹碉拷(婢跺洦鏁為敍姘櫌閸斺€虫値娴o拷)
鐎涳附婀抽獮鑼舵彛鐎涳附婀抽獮鑼舵彛
鐎涳附婀抽獮鑼舵彛娴滃瞼娣惍锟�瀵邦喕淇婇幍顐$閹碉拷娴滃棜袙閺堚偓閺傛澘顒熼張顖氬叡鐠愶拷
鐠佺儤鏋冩潏鍛嚤鐠佺儤鏋冩潏鍛嚤
鐠佺儤鏋冩潏鍛嚤娴滃瞼娣惍锟�瀵邦喕淇婇幍顐$閹碉拷濞h濮為懓浣哥瑎閿涘苯鍘ょ拹鐟版尒鐠囷拷
鐢牐绁幏娑樺珯鐢牐绁幏娑樺珯