24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3052  |  回复: 11
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

siliushui

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 第一次投稿被拒,请高人帮看看编辑回信和审稿意见 已有6人参与

问题:1.稿件按要求修改还可再投这家期刊吗?
          2.稿件的问题很大吗?再投其他刊物的可能性?审稿人说结论科学意义不大,还有必要继续修改吗?还是在选择期看上有什么讲究,是不是发表到好一点的会议上比较好,文章是一个新颖的初步探索,目前效果有,但是不是明显。
谢谢!

Dear Dr.
I have received the reviewers\' comments on your paper and regret that I cannot accept your manuscript for publication in the***.

The reviewers\' comments about your paper are included below.

Thank you for submitting your work to the ***.

Sincerely,

***


-----------------------------------

Reviewer comments:

Reviewer #2 (Reviewer Comments Required):

The idea flow of the paper can be improved. Suggest rewriting the paper in a natural way. Describe the entire system at the beginning and highlight the contribution clearly. For each part presented in paper, describe with clear definition, such as feature vector contents, how it is trained. Use better match symbol to represent the system. If it is referred from other place, point it out directly. Some figures do not match the caption and text. The experimental parts should compare with state-of-the-art methods to show its benefits.


Reviewer #3 (Reviewer Comments Required):

The paper proposes advanced tracking algorithm based on Hybrid Generative/Discriminative model, which is a combination of the two and with some additional features introduced (which is not clear enough).
English in the paper should be considerably improved so that the sentences are more understandable. In the form as it is at the moment it is really difficult to follow the paper. Also structuring of the paper should be improved with additional diagrams to facilitate the paper reading.
Results should be performed on more sequences and links for the sequences provided. Additionally, more state of the art algorithms (with references) should be used for comparison results.
Processing time should not be provided for the MATLAB because it gives very little information about the processing load and the speed of the algorithm. If you want to make statements on that please describe the load for the block, memory access, etc.



Reviewer #4 (Reviewer Comments Required):

The authors tried to present a so called hybrid object tracking algorithm by combining Fisher LDA and PCA. Harr-like features are used for training and appearance model updating purposes. However, the algorithm is poorly presented, and the experiments are too weak and with minor scientific merit. There are lots of language errors in the paper, and the organization of the paper is not clear too. Language needs to be significantly improved. Detailed commends are as below:
***
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ll550

木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
siliushui: 金币+1 2015-03-20 07:15:22
reviewer的英文真的还蛮一般的

[ 发自小木虫客户端 ]
livelong
6楼2015-03-19 21:35:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 12 个回答

siliushui

新虫 (小有名气)

谢谢,我先慢慢看看。
2楼2015-03-19 16:09:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

在比喻日年

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

寸理莱德

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励交流~ 2015-03-19 23:05:27
siliushui: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助, 准确,不过有点负面呀。 2015-03-20 00:22:47
我看来是审稿人说你的文章 首先英文差,创新性不充分,而且结论也不能满足审稿人的要求, 按照编辑的意思建议不要在投此期刊了 希望不大啊。
黄屋非贵,天下为忧。
3楼2015-03-19 16:22:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

欢欢考博

新虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
book2005593: 金币+1, 鼓励交流~ 2015-03-19 23:05:41
siliushui: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢你的建议:重新做图 2015-03-20 00:23:53
几个审稿人同时指出英文需要修改,好好修改文章语言,重新做图,改投其他期刊吧

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
4楼2015-03-19 19:17:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 YLHlRHNwYkce 2026-09-02 7/350 2026-09-03 17:02 by T0rGB46095mJ
[找工作] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 YLHlRHNwYkce 2026-09-02 10/500 2026-09-03 17:00 by T0rGB46095mJ
[找工作] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 8/400 2026-09-03 16:38 by T0rGB46095mJ
[硕博家园] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 5/250 2026-09-03 16:38 by T0rGB46095mJ
[考研] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 10/500 2026-09-03 16:27 by T0rGB46095mJ
[教师之家] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 ero8OE6tv9cu 2026-09-02 8/400 2026-09-03 14:48 by T0rGB46095mJ
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +10 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 14/700 2026-09-03 13:17 by qsd10086
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 YLHlRHNwYkce 2026-09-02 8/400 2026-09-03 12:03 by T0rGB46095mJ
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +8 gdd2018 2026-08-28 13/650 2026-09-03 06:22 by 羽毛枫f
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +7 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 14/700 2026-09-02 17:33 by ma0526
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
信息提示
请填处理意见