24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 6876  |  回复: 22
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

dyjor

铜虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 只有一个审稿人 三行意见 大修已有10人参与

2014年10月21日投的 11月5号under review  到了2015年1月11日又是under review 昨天终于迎来了意见 大修  但是一个只有一个审稿人 三行意见 求过来人帮忙解读!谢谢了!
View Letter
Dear :

I have received the reports from our advisors on your manuscript, "********", which you submitted to International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions.  When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments.  Your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript.

Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX)


In order to submit your revised manuscript electronically, please access the following web site:

     http://jamt.edmgr.com/

Your login is:  Your username is: ********
Your password is:  Your password is: ********

Please click "Author Login" to submit your revision.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript by May 30, 2015.  Thank you.

Best regards,

  
   Regional Editor
   International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology


COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

            
********

Reviewer:

The manuscript states on the development of a dual servo system for better positioning accuracy. And the experimental results show validity of the system in aspect of practical use. However, dual servo is general approach in precision engineering and it is difficult to find the main idea of the manuscript as it is.

Therefore, it is necessary to re-organize the manuscript with emphasizing the main idea compared to the previous ones in detail.


Editor:

In addition, please note the following:

1. Please make all changes in the revised submission into a different color font for easy tracking.

2. Please improve English and engage native proof-reader if available.

3. Please ensure that the reference is formatted according to IJAMT specification, i.e. in number format according to appearance, with family name + initials for all authors. In the list of references, do not use et al, please list all co-authors to give them citation credit.

4. Use only et al in the body of the paper itself if there are more than more authors. Use only family names, no titles and initials.

5. Please cite other related publications in IJAMT to reflect the relevance of your present submission.
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

sci教程

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zjjsd195

金虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

意见真实少啊,这么点,那就改吧,祝福!
5楼2015-03-07 09:12:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

TF-花雨流间

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

曲终人散皆是梦

优秀版主优秀版主文献杰出贡献文献杰出贡献

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
这有什么可疑问的,按照审稿人的意见修改呗

有的期刊是没有小修的,只要是修改就是大修,没投过你这个期刊,但是情况估计差不多

不管怎么样,就这么改呗
诚以待人。。。
2楼2015-03-02 12:37:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

在比喻日年

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

寸理莱德

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
dyjor: 金币+5, 有帮助 2015-03-12 21:01:30
大修小修其实没有明确接线 你只要按照审稿意见好好改就行。  一定点对点回答, 让编辑看到你认真的态度。
黄屋非贵,天下为忧。
3楼2015-03-02 13:45:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dyjor

铜虫 (小有名气)

lz并不是说大修小修不满意 只是觉得审稿人花了四五个月给出这么个意见 觉得有点糊弄人 而且不好改
4楼2015-03-03 08:16:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见