24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2574)
>虫友互识 (138)
>导师招生 (70)
>文献求助 (56)
>休闲灌水 (47)
>硕博家园 (40)
>考研 (26)
>考博 (22)
>博后之家 (18)
>基金申请 (17)
>论文投稿 (17)
>论文道贺祈福 (16)
>找工作 (15)
>教师之家 (14)
>公派出国 (14)
>金属 (4)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

w0a0n7g

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1607.1
红花: 1
帖子: 153
在线: 347.3小时
虫号: 2108541
注册: 2012-11-05
性别: GG
专业: 文学批评

[求助] 论文编辑给了大修，有个审稿人意见很笼统，该怎么回复？还有戏吗？已有6人参与

投了一个SCI期刊，编辑给了大修的机会，但是期刊规定只有一次的修改机会，要求在30天内修回。两个审稿人，一个提了很多意见，但是都很中肯，很负责的分点一一指出，但另一个审稿人只有一句话，说背景交代不清，说的很笼统，不知道该怎么回复啊，求大神指点！另外文章有希望中吗？好担心回答不当被拒啊……
编辑意见：
Your submission has been reviewed with some serious concerns about the paper content. However, I would like you to consider the reviewers comments included below and submit a revised manuscript before I make a final decision.

It is the policy of the Journal to allow only one revision. Thus it is important to respond to all of the reviewer points and to make it evident that you have done so. For this reason, in your response please note any changes that have been made to the manuscript and their location within the text. You may respond using the comment box provided online. Of course, you may not agree with the reviewers on every point; in this case, your responses and reasoning should be clearly presented.

Please upload your content and style revisions within 30 days.
审稿人一的意见：
The authors propose the use of ...
It is an interesting proposal but in my opinion the paper currently has a number of weak points that should be addressed.
...
审稿人二的意见：
Very vogue explanation of the new protocol, which is analyzed on...
Unclear background of traffic modeling, buffer considerations and a congestion setup.

回复此楼