| ²é¿´: 1267 | »Ø¸´: 5 | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
wen0081гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Õâ¸öÆÀÉóÒâ¼û»ú»á¶à´ó ÒÑÓÐ4È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
Á½¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬1#¸øÁËÒ»¶ÑÒâ¼û£¬×îºó»¹Ò»¸öre-submit£¬¸Ð¾õºÃÏñ¶ÔÎÒÎÄÕÂÓ¡ÏóÌØ±ð²»ºÃ£»2#¾ÍÊǼ¸¸ö²»Í´²»Ñ÷µÄСÒâ¼û£¬Õâ¸ö¾Í²»ÌûÁË¡£ ±à¼µÄÒâ¼ûÊÇËãÖÐÁ¢Â𣬻¹ÊDzîÆÀ°¡£¿²»ÖªµÀÐÞ¸ÄÏ£Íû´ó·ñ£¿Ê±¼äÒ²¸øµÄºÜ½ô£¬Ï¸öÔÂ21ºÅǰ¾ÍÐ޻أ¬ ¶øÇÒ»¹ÒªÇóÇ©°æÈ¨ÐÒ飬ÓÃWORD°æ±¾Í¶¸å£¬ÅŰ水ÕÕеÄÒªÇóµÈ¡£ Reviewers' comments: AE Comments: There are some clarity and consistency issues with the paper. Please address all comments from the two reviewers and submit your responses and a revised manuscript. Reviewer #1: The paper deals with a very specific problem, "Bank-to-Turn Guidance Law with Terminal Impact Angle Constraint". The paper is difficult to read and follow the development. For example, right in the abstract they mention the following, - "The new zero effort miss-distance (ZEM)including position and angle control terms is introduced". Since it is a zero effort miss-distance, why is the angle control a part of this term? To me the definition of ZEM and their specification of the same are inconsistent. - "Then the BTT guidance law can be implemented in another form constructed by usable variables and hence is of practical use". What does this mean? Are there instances of guidance laws that involve useless variables? - "When using the BTT guidance law, the acceleration command will keep above the zero and thereby avoid the singularity problem" Is the singularity at zero and/or below zero? Why is the acceleration command above zero (this statement is strange)? Throughout the rest of the paper "constraint" is spelled as "constrain". The introduction is very poorly written. Instead of saying look at BTT in references [1-4], the authors should summarize the literature relevant to their problem and how their approach is better or different from these. Line 26: The arctangent function is often used to computer the roll angle command (compute not computer) Line 28: Citation issue to be fixed. Line 33, 34: Doesnt make sense. Line 58: "Inertial" and not Initial Line 62: "Inertial" and not Initial Line 72: autopilot "dynamics" Lines 82, 84: What are "status"? From equation 8 onwards the analysis is wrong. V is a function of tgo and tgo is (tF - t). Clearly, tgo is a function of time. The authors specify an explicit time dependent Lypaunov function. However the stability analysis is the same as for an autonomous nonlinear system. Line 123: The equation doesnt makes sense. dM = ? Is it a variation in M? If so then there should be RHS terms involving variations in other dependent quantities as well. After this the results didnt make any sense. I think the paper is not complete mathematically. There are inconsistent mix and match of variations, derivatives etc without proper explanation. The paper may have results but at this point, I dont follow their mathematics. I suggest they clean up the derivations and re-submit. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
291·Öµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
µ÷¼ÁÇóÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
291 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ38È˻ظ´
22408 312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũҵ071010£¬320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ41È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
211±¾¿Æ²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«Ê¡»ù½ð2026
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ҩѧÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£¬¿´Â¼ÓõĸÅÂÊ´óô
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
ÈçºÎ¿´³öÆÀÉóÒâ¼ûÊÇA£¬B,C »¹ÊÇD
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
°ïÎÒ¿´ÏÂÓÐAÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ699È˻ظ´
Ò»·ÝJMCAµÄÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´ÈçºÎ»Ø¸´£¬Ð»Ð»£¡
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´major reviseºóÓÐÏ£ÍûÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Í¶Ð޸ĸåͼƬµÄÒªÇó
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Õâ¸ö²©ºó»¹ÓÐÏ·Âð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò¿´ÕâÑùµÄÉó¸åÆÀÓﻹÓÐÖеĻú»áÓжà´ó£¨major modifications£©
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ï¿´Ò»ÏÂÕâ¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼û¼¬ÊÖ²»£¬Ð»Ð»ÁË¡£
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
½üÈýÄêÇàÄê»ù½ðµÄÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬¿´¿´ÉÏ»áÁ˼¸´Î£¿
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
˰ïÎÒ¿´¿´Õâ¸öÏìÓ¦Ãæ½á¹û£¿Ð»Ð»
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Surface and Coatings Technology ÍâÉóÒâ¼û major revision °ïÎÒ¿´¿´ÓÐÏ£Íû²»£¿
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
Çë´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´×¨¼ÒÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬Õâ¸ö¿ÎÌ⻹ÓмÌÐøÉ걨µÄ¼ÛÖµÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´£¨ÈçÓкõĽ¨ÒéºÍÒâ¼û£¬½«Çë°æÖ÷°ïæɢ½ð±Ò£©
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
°ïæ¿´Ò»ÏÂ×ԿƹÜÀíѧ¶þ²¿ÇàÄê¿ÎÌâÆÀÉóÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
¿´¿´»ù½ðÆÀÉóÒâ¼ûÊÇÊôÓÚA£¬B£¬CÄÄÒ»ÖÖ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ32È˻ظ´
Õâ¸öÆÀÉóÒâ¼ûÊǼ¸A¼¸B°¡£¿Çà»ùΪʲôÓÐËĸöÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¿
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´Õâ¸öÇàÄê»ù½ðÒâ¼ûÊǼ¸A¼¸B¼¸C£¬ÓбØÒªÕâ´ÎÉêÇëÖØÐÂÆÀÉóÂð£¿
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÎÒÏîÄ¿µÄר¼ÒÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬
ÒѾÓÐ31È˻ظ´
ÍâÉóÒâ¼û»ØÀ´ÁË£¬Ó¦¸ÃÊÇmajor revise¡£ÏëÈôó¼Ò¿´¿´£¬Óжà´ó»ú»á¼ÓÃ
ÒѾÓÐ29È˻ظ´
´ó¼Ò°ïÎÒ¿´¿´ÆÀÓïµÄÇé¿ö°¡£¬Ð»Ð»£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ43È˻ظ´
ר¼ÒÆÀÉóÒâ¼û
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ÐÅÏ¢¶þ´¦»ù½ðÆÀÉóÒâ¼û£¬Çë´ó¼ÒÕÅÌù³ö×Ô¼ºµÄÆÀÓï½»Á÷ѧϰ
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
×Ô˽µÄè1988
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 4800 (¸±½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 6.746
- ½ð±Ò: 50040.4
- É¢½ð: 11517
- ºì»¨: 256
- ɳ·¢: 134
- Ìû×Ó: 11684
- ÔÚÏß: 1473.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2004083
- ×¢²á: 2012-09-16
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Óлú·Ö×Ó¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ»¯Ñ§
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
3Â¥2014-11-07 19:30:08
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
|
±¾ÌûÄÚÈݱ»ÆÁ±Î |
2Â¥2014-11-07 12:07:53
dandanrushui
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 67 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2558.5
- É¢½ð: 436
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 805
- ÔÚÏß: 221.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2161381
- ×¢²á: 2012-12-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »úе²âÊÔÀíÂÛÓë¼¼Êõ
4Â¥2014-11-07 19:39:16
xbzhang2012
гæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 133 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3195.1
- É¢½ð: 500
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 997
- ÔÚÏß: 199.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1913216
- ×¢²á: 2012-07-27
- רҵ: ½ðÊô²ÄÁϵÄÖÆ±¸¿ÆÑ§Óë¿çѧ
5Â¥2014-11-07 20:23:47














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20