24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (1544)
>论文投稿 (35)
>硕博家园 (31)
>考研 (31)
>论文道贺祈福 (28)
>找工作 (27)
>导师招生 (24)
>虫友互识 (20)
>公派出国 (20)
>基金申请 (19)
>考博 (19)
>教师之家 (16)
>博后之家 (13)
>文献求助 (13)
>休闲灌水 (6)
>海外博后 (5)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

shangxingbin

新虫 (著名写手)

应助: 230 (大学生)
金币: 1796.1
帖子: 2022
在线: 621.2小时
虫号: 1229905

[交流] 论文被拒，自己心服口服。

如题，看了审稿意见，自己的确心服口服。虽然文章没有毛病，但是水平达不到啊，骚年，加油吧！不要灰心
The advice to consider another journal is sound.

The following includes some additional input from the reviewer, conveyed after further communication with the associate editor. This input further clarifies that while the manuscript makes some contributions, those are mainly incremental in nature and better suited for other venues. The associate editor agrees with that view and does not recommend publication in CORROSION:

The reviewer noted: The article is quite basic (although accurate) and most of the information and conclusions are known, have been the standard analysis for years and are taught in NACE basic/advanced classes and publications. The use of BEM software for modeling and the conclusions do however provide some additional verification of we have observed for years. As an example the simple case of two parallel pipelines and a CP anode in figure 3 results in a prediction of current pickup near the anode and current discharge upstream and downstream on the foreign pipeline. This has been known for years (see pages 29 and 136 fig. 12-2, A. W. Peabody, "Control of Pipeline Corrosion", 1968" and manual soil voltage gradient calculations to estimate the effects are routinely used by CP practitioners. Field testing is always required in the complex real would to mitigate interference issues. The reviewer does not see how this article provides a meaningful step forward in the understanding of CP interference.

The reviewer feels this article does not meet the criterion of scientific advancement for publication in the Corrosion Journal. The reviewer feels the article would be better suited for Materials Performance where the readers are interested in application and verification of what is observed in the field (the commercial concern remains).

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-10-22 09:54:48

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

意得辑

捐助贵宾 (正式写手)

应助: 118 (高中生)
金币: 27.7
帖子: 710
在线: 624.8小时
虫号: 2645242

商家已经主动声明此回帖可能含有宣传内容

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖

楼主的心态非常好也很幸运遇到尽责的审稿人。
拒稿确实是发表过程中经常会发生的经历，但无需因拒稿而灰心，将拒稿当作一个学习经验，进一步改善论文，相信终有成功发表的时候！

与你分享《意得辑专家视点》上的视频：
化拒稿为成功发表的力量 http://www.editage.cn/insights/t ... positive-experience

祝福楼主！

- Eddy博士