| 查看: 3557 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
aglistone木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
审稿意见回来，一个同意小修后发表，一个建议加数据，主编要改，怎么办 已有1人参与
|
|
|
审稿意见如下：第一位专家的评审建议： 本论文报告了一些桦木醇和桦木酸的30位三唑衍生物的合成，并初步评估了生物活性，其合成反应设计合理，所得化合物的分析数据也较充分，可建议录用。 文中有些小错，请认真检查。 第二位专家的评审建议： In this manuscript, some C-30 triazole substituted betulin and betulinic acid derivatives were synthesized, and their cytotoxic activities were evaluated. As the authors mentioned, Anitimonova et al have published the synthesis work of a similar series of C-30 triazole derivatives last year. The synthetic procedure used in this manuscript was similar to that of Anitimonova’s work, and the compound 5a has already been reported in the published paper. Although the reported biological activities in these two works were different from each other, and the finding of more cytotoxic analogues seems interesting, it is not very meaningful to publish this manuscript in its current form in this journal. It is recommended to supplement more works before it is accepted for publication, e.g., synthesizing more structural diversity compounds and evaluating their SARs. 总审建议：参照专家建议修改后，可发表，但作者应对专家建议作出逐条答复。此外，编辑部将对您的修改稿进行编辑加工。 ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————----分割线 我该怎么办？要加数据吗？老板说不加数据了，给审稿人2解释一下就行了。 版上的大牛们经验丰富，遇到这种意见该怎么办？另，这是一篇sci期刊，影响因子0.95.不是top期刊。学校要求top期刊才可以毕业。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国自然评审意见
已经有12人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有12人回复
-
有没有仍没收到信息的
已经有3人回复
-
导师吐槽：我怎么摊上了这么个极品研究生！
已经有8人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有11人回复
-
麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见（F口面上）
已经有9人回复
-
2026年叶企孙基金
已经有6人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 审稿人让小修，但是这个意见怎么回复比较好？
已经有3人回复
- 大修审稿意见，重金求教如何回复
已经有49人回复
- 文章的审稿意见回来了，觉得审稿人意见有问题，想写argue，请教怎么写argue
已经有9人回复
- 审稿意见求助(是小修还是大改？)
已经有13人回复
- 论文已被编辑接收，但是有一个审稿人要求小修，我还需要回复他吗?
已经有4人回复
- 一个审稿人建议小修，另一个审稿人拒稿，最后编辑拒稿，怎么办？
已经有15人回复
- 大修终于回来了，要小修，有一个审稿人难缠咋办呀
已经有6人回复
- 审稿意见如何回复
已经有8人回复
- 论文两个审稿人让小修，一个审稿人拒绝，结果编辑拒稿了，这种情况还有希望吗？
已经有41人回复
- 小修，审稿意见如何回复啊
已经有10人回复
- 审稿意见回来，一小修，两拒
已经有7人回复
- chemical communications小修，审稿人意见请教
已经有8人回复
- 审稿意见，小修，有些问题不明白
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见两个要大修，一个小修后直接录用，这机会大吗？
已经有4人回复
- 审稿意见全是小修，认真修回后却被拒了。这是啥情况？
已经有47人回复
- 第一次投文章，虽然是小修，但是审稿人给的审稿意见看不明白啊，请各位帮忙！！
已经有6人回复
- 文章小修 其中一审稿人意见
已经有11人回复
- 一年后收到初审意见没标明大修还是小修
已经有9人回复
- 审稿意见：一个大修，两个小修
已经有34人回复
- 有一个审稿人意见明显拒了,但编辑给的是小修,录用机率有多少?
已经有29人回复
- Optics Communications小修,审稿意见怎么回答,请指教~
已经有4人回复
- 编辑小修，三个审稿人有一个较为负面该怎么回答
已经有7人回复
- 文章小修可否对审稿人的意见不加以答复？
已经有10人回复
- 一个说据，一个说小修，结果裁定为大修
已经有28人回复
aglistone
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2015.8
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 159
- 在线: 220.3小时
- 虫号: 1423320
- 注册: 2011-09-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
4楼2014-09-12 13:26:52
自私的猫1988
荣誉版主 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 4800 (副教授)
- 贵宾: 6.746
- 金币: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 红花: 256
- 沙发: 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在线: 1473.7小时
- 虫号: 2004083
- 注册: 2012-09-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学
- 管辖: 论文投稿
2楼2014-09-12 10:39:03
aglistone
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2015.8
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 159
- 在线: 220.3小时
- 虫号: 1423320
- 注册: 2011-09-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境工程
|
主编回信时这样的：Your manuscript entitled "Synthesis and cytotoxicity of triterpenoids derived from betulin and betulinic acid via click chemistry" which you submitted to Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter. The reviewer(s) would like to see some revisions made to your manuscript before publication. Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript. When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text. To submit the revision, log into http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ganp and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewer(s) in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewer(s). IMPORTANT: Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript. Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission. Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible. If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission. Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of Asian Natural Products Research and I look forward to receiving your revision. |
3楼2014-09-12 13:25:40
30