| 查看: 3586 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
求助啊！第一次sci投稿竟遇到这样的悲剧，我该申诉吗？已有3人参与
|
|||
|
第一篇投稿真是磨死自己了 地球科学专业，投稿Canadian Journal of Earth Science，4区的杂志。因为导师和主编很熟，因为很容易的，就掉以轻心吊儿郎当了（先自责一下这是最大原因） 从投稿到现在final decision已经过去一年了，8月中旬主编还和导师见了一面说文章没问题的，结果主编回去就发来了一个reject的decision，郁闷啊！ 第一次外审，意见都是小修，主编意见是major revision。改回后变为minor revision，说还要改一些图表。 改好后说基本没问题了，只剩语言问题（第一次修改用的shinewriter进行的润色，改动很不错，很好，但第二次继续找shinewriter由于用的是加急，质量很不好） 再改一道回去（已经是第二道revision了），说还是有语言问题，由于编辑很熟悉我们学校，推荐了一个在我们学校的外教，native speaker，帮忙修改 但是当时正是暑假，外教说要回去了，不给改。只好找了两个英语很好的同学帮忙修改。改回去之后发回 这一次本来是想终于可以过了吧，结果主编看了之后直接给个reject的decision letter ,同时说推荐一个助理编辑帮我再给一些审稿意见，让我再投稿 好郁闷啊，好想申诉啊。因为重新投稿是不是又得外审还得等很久啊，郁闷的要死，求助！！！！ 附上final decision letter I write you in regards to manuscript *** which you submitted to Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. As you will see in the letter below by our Associate Editor, the acceptance of your manuscript is not recommended for publication for the following main reasons: 1. After three revisions, the manuscript is still full of English errors. It is not written clearly using correct grammar and syntax. The Associate Editor did not find a significant improvement in English. You must find a native English-speaking person to help you with the grammar. 2. There are also many technical errors where you have used outdated geological terminology and incorrect geological terms. 3. Changes you have made were inappropriate for the journal. Accordingly, I deeply regret to let you know that your revised manuscript is way below the standards of Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. Accordingly, I have no choice but reject the manuscript. I am so sorry for this decision, but it was inevitable given the regulations and standards of our journal. Good news is that the Associate Editor, **** is willing to help you to improve the manuscript, so that it can be resubmitted to CJES as a new manuscript. Please send your manuscript as a Word document to Dr. ****(e-mail: ****), so that he can provide you with a few pages of annotated text highlighting the nature of the errors you have made in your revisions. Following Dr. McFarlane’s help, I will also take a look the manuscript and make suggestions for you. Best regards, ***** Associate Editor's Comments to Author: Despite two attempts and numerous suggestions to have the manuscript copy-edited by a native english-speaking geoscientist, I see no significant improvement in the language and grammar in the manuscript. The document I received with 'track-changes' annotations shows that the authors have missed numerous errors and have made inappropriate corrections that, in many cases, have adversely affected the quality manuscript. There are still numerous instances of misuses of geological terminology or out-dated terminology and fixing these issues is beyond the scope of any additional reviewers or the editorial board. Nor have the tables been revised and reformatted appropriately following CJES style. Hence, I have no choice but to deem the manuscript unacceptable for publication in CJES. I regret having to make this recommendation, but until there is significant improvement in the technical writing and grammar and other formatting I see no way forward. If the authors wish to provide a Word document of the manuscript I can provide a few pages of annotated text highlighting the nature of the errors. Please note it is the responsibility of the Corresponding Author to communicate the status of the manuscript to all co-authors. Thank you for considering Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences for the publication of your research. I hope the outcome of this specific submission will not discourage you from the submission of future manuscripts. * |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
投稿返修中，增加了作者，论文被拒了，还有办法补救嘛？
已经有16人回复
-
咨询一下，去江西高校工作和发展前景怎么样
已经有13人回复
-
哪里招科研助理
已经有3人回复
-
求个博导把我捞走，一篇JMCA，另有一篇AFM共一
已经有6人回复
-
请教大家一个问题
已经有4人回复
-
搞科研是不是很锻炼身体？高血压，痛风是小病
已经有7人回复
-
换导师学院里面不同意咋办，原导师现导师都同意了
已经有17人回复
-
长江学者评审开始了，有评审专家爆料被地毯式打招呼
已经有14人回复
-
博士毕业后将大论文拆分成小论文发表是否属于学术不端
已经有17人回复
-
这是必须要润色吗
已经有9人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- Optics Express两个审稿人同意，一个拒绝的意思，申诉会成功吗？？？
已经有11人回复
- optical materials 投稿一个月没信息 是不是悲剧了啊
已经有5人回复
- 第一次投SCI，稿件投出去3天了，一点回音也没有。。。是不是悲剧了？
已经有3人回复
- 两次投稿遇到同一个审稿人。。。
已经有25人回复
- 第一篇SCI被主编5天拒了，转投中
已经有38人回复
- 审稿六个月悲剧-不过意见是修改后马上接收？
已经有11人回复
- sci一个拒绝，一个推荐发表，编辑拒稿，是否申诉？？？
已经有39人回复
- sci投稿给了一审意见，被拒稿了，但是我觉得文章还行，想要申诉，该怎么处理？
已经有9人回复
- 一篇SCI的文章悲剧了好几次，求助解决方式
已经有7人回复
- 被拒的文章该反驳就得反驳，这意味着希望
已经有13人回复
- 昨天审稿完，今天意见返回了，悲剧了(PROVISIONALLY REJECTED)，这样还有希望吗？
已经有6人回复
- 论文被拒后申诉成功并最终录用
已经有33人回复
- SSCI大修后再送另一审稿人被拒，请大家帮看一下意见
已经有32人回复
- 第一次投国内核心期刊，被退稿。。。悲催。。
已经有85人回复
- 文章被拒了，两个审稿人意见完全相反，值得申诉么？
已经有45人回复
- SCI退修重投，还有戏吗
已经有11人回复
- [计算机应用]第一次投稿，退稿，亮了！！！
已经有23人回复
- 大家帮忙看看，这种情况如何回复编辑及申诉
已经有15人回复
- 圣诞前一天文章莫名其妙被拒稿，申诉成功后今天戏剧接收
已经有231人回复
- JMC 小修竟然悲剧啦，是申述呢，还是改投其他的杂志？虫友给给意见啊
已经有129人回复
- 投稿Langmuir，审稿人都说可以发表，编辑拒稿，这种情况有必要申诉吗？
已经有10人回复
- 退稿了，后面还有一个再退修是啥意思啊！
已经有5人回复
- 第一次投稿退稿，咨询and小结
已经有12人回复
- 说说我遇上的审稿人
已经有43人回复
- nature materials投稿求助
已经有25人回复
- 论文小修被退稿，想申述
已经有10人回复
3楼2014-09-02 11:07:57
7楼2014-09-02 17:00:35
8楼2014-09-02 18:39:33
10