24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1912  |  回复: 10
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jushangzhi

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] optics communications返回意见minor revision,但意见我没大看懂。。。求助 已有3人参与

各位大神,小弟最近往op投了篇论文,主要是写一种新型的单光子探测器结构,返回意见很快,只有一个专家意见,他的大致意思是我的仿真做的很好,但结果不能说明这个探测器能够实现单光子探测,最后他写了这么一句:
I recommend that the paper be accepted once the authors remove reference to single photon counting.
remove reference是啥意思?是让我不要把探测器定位成单光子探测器吗?各位大神以前有没有遇到过类似情况?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youyouyanr

铁虫 (著名写手)

是问下楼主的稿件编辑 是中国人还是英国的

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]
认真交流
8楼2014-05-27 17:47:29
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

fzq

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
删掉有关“单光子探测”部分?

“不能说明这个探测器能够实现单光子探测”  是不是就让你直接不提及“单光子探测”部分。
2楼2014-05-27 08:51:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jushangzhi

铁虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by fzq at 2014-05-27 08:51:20
删掉有关“单光子探测”部分?

“不能说明这个探测器能够实现单光子探测”  是不是就让你直接不提及“单光子探测”部分。

我也感觉是这么个意思,但是不大确定,这么改感觉有点投机取巧的意思。。。老外也这么不负责任的么……
3楼2014-05-27 09:08:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jushangzhi

铁虫 (初入文坛)

还有木有大神给点意见,我再把专家质疑的那部分摘录上,大神们给我出出主意应该怎么改啊!
However, the claim that this device is appropriate for single photon detection are not justified. It is true that the authors can see a shift between the dark and illuminated characteristics with ~ single photon input pulses. However, the dark current is comparable to the photocurrent, which will result in excessive dark counts in Geiger mode. In linear mode, the signal to noise ratio is too small. For example, in a typical optical receiver, the dark current of the APD is a few nA while the minimum detectable power for digital transmission is on the order of a few microamperes. If the authors intend to use this device in linear mode, they need to show that the noise will not be greater than that for a standard avalanche photodiode. I recommend that the paper be accepted once the authors remove reference to single photon counting.
4楼2014-05-27 15:29:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见