24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lnqswjtu

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 22 (小学生)
金币: 428.4
帖子: 742
在线: 247.5小时
虫号: 596810

[交流] IEEE PTL awaiting decision, 求祝福

IEEE PTL 外审三个月了。。现在状态为 Awaiting decision.

这次审了这么久了，就祝福呀。一般情况下，1~2月就出结果，这篇文章审稿3月，好忐忑呀~求分析，求祝福。

由于金币有限，先发6个给大家把。谢谢

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

求个博导看看已经有18人回复
自荐读博已经有6人回复
带资进组求博导收留已经有13人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球已经有5人回复
青基代表作，AAAI之类的A会的special track在国内认可度高吗？还是归为workshop之流？已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士已经有6人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生已经有4人回复
求助院士们，这个如何合成呀已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名已经有9人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文，论文内容以实验为主，投什么期刊合适？已经有6人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

论文大修催稿后，悲剧了，求安慰已经有6人回复
IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology Awaiting Decision Approval 已经有7人回复
IEEE Trans的Awaiting AE Decision 已经有18人回复
IEEE transactions 投稿，刚一个半月就awaiting EIC decision了已经有25人回复
请教关于IEEE TSMC 投审稿的一些问题已经有22人回复
IEEE EDL 投稿状态由awaiting Preliminary ED decision变为under review 已经有11人回复
IEEE PTL的Editor返回意见是moderate revision？已经有13人回复
IEEE EDL 二审under review 10天左右就进入awaiting ED preliminary decision 已经有7人回复
IEEE Trans 的awaiting AE decision和with editor有什么区别？已经有6人回复
IEEE的Awaiting AE Assignment是什么意思？已经有9人回复
IEEE PTL 由with reviewer到under review，审稿结束了吗？已经有4人回复
IEEE TSP三审需要多长时间啊？已经有11人回复
IEEE PTL投稿5个星期已经有35人回复
IEEE TWC， awaiting editor decision两周了，请问什么意思？是凶是吉？已经有16人回复
IEEE communications letters awaiting decision了不知道什么时候出结果已经有21人回复
IEEE CL Awaiting Decision一般多久？已经有6人回复
IEEE PTL with reviewer一个月左右后变成under review什么意思啊已经有12人回复
awaiting decision后又under review 已经有11人回复
ieee CL的awaiting decision要等多久啊？已经有6人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-05-26 10:05:32

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

lnqswjtu

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 22 (小学生)
金币: 428.4
帖子: 742
在线: 247.5小时
虫号: 596810

引用回帖:

10楼: Originally posted by muchongwoai at 2014-05-26 12:20:01
祝福楼主了，等出结果后，如果楼主愿意将投稿历程和感受发到木虫上，那将对各位虫友有很大帮助。。

个人觉得让修改就有机会。“extensive revision”也是容易过关的。只要咱们认真回答审稿人问题就OK. 自己也做了N篇文章的审稿人了，感觉作者们如果认真回答审稿人的问题，就是对审稿人的尊重。只要过得去，一般会手下留情的。。

以下是“ extensive revision”后，我修改了不到一周时间，返回到审稿人。之后不到一个月，文章就被接受发表了。

Reviewers' Comments

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: A = This paper should be published in PTL rapidly pending minor typographical errors detailed in my comments.

Comments:
The authors have made necessary changes to address the comments. I therefore recommend the paper for publication.

Additional Questions:
Technical Content: High

Please rate the author’s English usage.: Good

Reviewer: 3

Recommendation: A = This paper should be published in PTL rapidly pending minor typographical errors detailed in my comments.

Comments:
I sugget to accept this manuscript in its present form

Additional Questions:
Technical Content: High

Please rate the author’s English usage.: Good

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: A = This paper should be published in PTL rapidly pending minor typographical errors detailed in my comments.

Comments:
I am happy with the changes you made to the equations 1 and 2 by removing the noise sources. **** plots provided in the revised manuscript are useful to establish the true nature of the *** behavior (away from **** effects).

Additional Questions:
Technical Content: Medium

Please rate the author’s English usage.: Good

Associate Editor's Comments

Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
Dear Authors,
After addressing the concerns of the reviewers in your resubmitted manuscript, the paper is now suitable for publication. Please make sure to carry out a final thorough proof read for your published version.

Editor-in-Chief's Comments

Note: If any of the reviews include an additional attached file, it will not be attached to this message. To access it, log in your Author Center and click on "Decision (View Letter)" -- this brings up this message, and at the bottom is the attached file. Click on that file name and you can see the attached comments from reviewers.