| 查看: 8905 | 回复: 22 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
IEEE PTL awaiting decision, 求祝福
|
|||
|
IEEE PTL 外审三个月了。。现在状态为 Awaiting decision. 这次审了这么久了，就祝福呀。 一般情况下，1~2月就出结果，这篇文章审稿3月，好忐忑呀~求分析，求祝福。 由于金币有限，先发6个给大家把。谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
Ei源刊怎么投
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
-
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有10人回复
-
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有6人回复
-
两块石头
已经有5人回复
-
哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生
已经有3人回复
-
找导师
已经有8人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 论文大修催稿后，悲剧了，求安慰
已经有6人回复
- IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology Awaiting Decision Approval
已经有7人回复
- IEEE Trans的Awaiting AE Decision
已经有18人回复
- IEEE transactions 投稿，刚一个半月就awaiting EIC decision了
已经有25人回复
- 请教关于IEEE TSMC 投审稿的一些问题
已经有22人回复
- IEEE EDL 投稿状态由awaiting Preliminary ED decision变为under review
已经有11人回复
- IEEE PTL的Editor返回意见是moderate revision？
已经有13人回复
- IEEE EDL 二审under review 10天左右就进入awaiting ED preliminary decision
已经有7人回复
- IEEE Trans 的awaiting AE decision和with editor有什么区别？
已经有6人回复
- IEEE的Awaiting AE Assignment是什么意思？
已经有9人回复
- IEEE PTL 由with reviewer到under review，审稿结束了吗？
已经有4人回复
- IEEE TSP三审需要多长时间啊？
已经有11人回复
- IEEE PTL投稿5个星期
已经有35人回复
- IEEE TWC， awaiting editor decision两周了，请问什么意思？是凶是吉？
已经有16人回复
- IEEE communications letters awaiting decision了 不知道什么时候出结果
已经有21人回复
- IEEE CL Awaiting Decision一般多久？
已经有6人回复
- IEEE PTL with reviewer一个月左右后 变成under review什么意思啊
已经有12人回复
- awaiting decision后又under review
已经有11人回复
- ieee CL的awaiting decision要等多久啊？
已经有6人回复
|
个人觉得让修改就有机会。“extensive revision”也是容易过关的。只要咱们认真回答审稿人问题就OK. 自己也做了N篇文章的审稿人了，感觉作者们如果认真回答审稿人的问题，就是对审稿人的尊重。只要过得去，一般会手下留情的。。 以下是“ extensive revision”后，我修改了不到一周时间，返回到审稿人。之后不到一个月，文章就被接受发表了。 Reviewers' Comments Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: A = This paper should be published in PTL rapidly pending minor typographical errors detailed in my comments. Comments: The authors have made necessary changes to address the comments. I therefore recommend the paper for publication. Additional Questions: Technical Content: High Please rate the author’s English usage.: Good Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: A = This paper should be published in PTL rapidly pending minor typographical errors detailed in my comments. Comments: I sugget to accept this manuscript in its present form Additional Questions: Technical Content: High Please rate the author’s English usage.: Good Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: A = This paper should be published in PTL rapidly pending minor typographical errors detailed in my comments. Comments: I am happy with the changes you made to the equations 1 and 2 by removing the noise sources. **** plots provided in the revised manuscript are useful to establish the true nature of the *** behavior (away from **** effects). Additional Questions: Technical Content: Medium Please rate the author’s English usage.: Good Associate Editor's Comments Associate Editor Comments to the Author: Dear Authors, After addressing the concerns of the reviewers in your resubmitted manuscript, the paper is now suitable for publication. Please make sure to carry out a final thorough proof read for your published version. Editor-in-Chief's Comments Note: If any of the reviews include an additional attached file, it will not be attached to this message. To access it, log in your Author Center and click on "Decision (View Letter)" -- this brings up this message, and at the bottom is the attached file. Click on that file name and you can see the attached comments from reviewers. |
22楼2014-06-15 17:29:47
3楼2014-05-26 10:12:49
8楼2014-05-26 10:26:47
9楼2014-05-26 10:52:08