24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3059)
>虫友互识 (234)
>文献求助 (163)
>导师招生 (71)
>休闲灌水 (50)
>考博 (46)
>招聘信息布告栏 (41)
>博后之家 (34)
>硕博家园 (23)
>论文投稿 (19)
>晶体 (18)
>论文道贺祈福 (16)
>考研 (15)
>公派出国 (14)
>教师之家 (13)
>有机资源 (10)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

honeyxiong

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 4 (幼儿园)
金币: 158.7
帖子: 636
在线: 295.6小时
虫号: 1364655

[交流] 大家看看APS期刊的审稿回复，这算是重投吗？

编辑的回复如下：
The Physical Review editors wish to accept only papers that, in addition to being scientifically sound, are important to the field and significantly advance physics. The appended comments suggest that these acceptance criteria are not met, and that the manuscript is better suited for a more specialized journal.

However, if you believe that you can address this criticism, we will give further consideration. Should you resubmit, please include a summary of the changes you have made and a brief response to all points raised by the referees.

不知道这还有戏吗？等了半年，等到这结果，都没有信心再重投了。。。。。

回复此楼