24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2920  |  回复: 14

yjh1986

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by qinger1110 at 2014-05-09 10:03:40
5月5号自己修改后重新投稿,5月7号with editor,5月8号under review,只要相信自己,不能轻易被编辑拒搞的理由打击!!!

楼主,现在怎么样了,接受了吗?
11楼2015-03-24 21:45:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qinger1110

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by yangwg8088 at 2014-05-04 12:13:59
应该是希望不大,据稿理由是套话。改投吧,省的浪费时间

已经接受了,虽然时间有半年,但结果是好的,谢谢你
12楼2015-05-21 12:48:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qinger1110

铜虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by longway90 at 2014-06-05 23:25:15
楼主投了多久后收到来信的?  我也是这杂志,投了将近两个月了,还是under review.......

这个正常哦,我也是这样的,过年前文章接受了。
13楼2015-05-21 12:49:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

1021779650

新虫 (初入文坛)

你好,我投这个杂志,编辑也这么说,请问你是怎么回复的?谢谢       
1.Moreover that a plant is used medicinally is also not sufficient, the effect studied should be clearly related to the traditional use.
2.Just mentioning an anecdotal report is not sufficient either, there must be a clear published scientific observation obtained in a study following (inter)nationally accepted rules, as publishing such observations may interfere with the IP rights of the indigenous people.
14楼2015-12-13 18:44:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

1021779650

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by shuibingjie at 2014-12-05 09:17:48
您好,我想请问下针对这两条意见你是如何修改的?我也是跟你一模一样的意见,求指教,我感觉我快要泪奔了,大恩不言谢

您好,我投JEP,编辑也给了这样的意见,请问您是怎么回复的?
1.        Moreover that a plant is used medicinally is also not sufficient, the effect studied should be clearly related to the traditional use.
2.        Just mentioning an anecdotal report is not sufficient either, there must be a clear published scientific observation obtained in a study following (inter)nationally accepted rules, as publishing such observations may interfere with the IP rights of the indigenous people.
15楼2015-12-13 18:55:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 qinger1110 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见