| 查看: 1929 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
比较奇怪的拒稿信，发出来给大家看看！ 已有5人参与
|
|||
|
一篇自我感觉良好的文章发到CBP，Part C，1月27投稿，一直没收到任何邮件，昨天发信催稿，得到如下回复： Dear Dr. X Thanks for your letter. I've checked your file and you were sent a decision letter from the editor on February 18, 2014. I'm sorry if for some reason you did not receive this. I've copied it below for you. Kind regards, Marlene From:Martin Grosell <cbpcmartin@gmail.com> To:"Dong X" <X@163.com> Cc: Bcc: Subject: Decision on CBP ms.23241 Dear Dr. X: Thank you for submitting your manuscript “Disruption of the XXXX” for consideration for publication in CBP. We regret to have to inform you that the editors, after consultation with members of the CBP Editorial Board and after contacting potential external reviewers, have decided not to pursue external review of your manuscript any further and to close the file. Unfortunately, after contacting numerous experts in the field, there was not a single one willing to accept the referee assignment. We have taken these responses as a lack of enthusiasm for the fit of your paper to the readership of CBP. We carefully choose reviewers for their expertise and their interests and involvement in comparative fields. The reviewers’ disappointing lack of interest in your manuscript is a reasonable indication that you would be missing the intended target audience by pursuing publication of this particular study in CBP. Finally, please note that CBP receives many more high quality submissions than we could possibly handle (or publish) and therefore, we have to take a relatively hard line on manuscripts that are deemed of peripheral interest to our readership or represent an incremental advance in knowledge only, at least within a comparative framework. Our decision does neither reflect on the quality of the research reported, nor on the quality of the issues addressed. We regret to have to convey this disappointing message, but we are positive that you will find a more appreciative reviewing climate and readership in a more specialist journal. Thank you for considering CBP. Best wishes, Dr. Tom Mommsen & Dr. Pat J. Walsh Editors-in-Chief Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 我个人感觉这意思就是文章水平不咋地，我们没兴趣，不想浪费时间，各位虫友觉得呢？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
348求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
350求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
309分085801求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
生物学308分求调剂（一志愿华东师大）
已经有3人回复
-
求调剂：一志愿：南京大学 专业：0705 总分320 ，本科985，四六级已过
已经有3人回复
-
环境工程 085701，267求调剂
已经有14人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
求调剂：085600材料与化工，考材科基，总分319
已经有21人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
294分080500材料科学与工程求调剂
已经有13人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 昨天刚投稿今天就收到来信得知被拒，而且....，有古怪，请帮我分析下
已经有18人回复
- 写了催稿信，编辑的回复，大家帮忙看看
已经有7人回复
- 请大家给看看审稿人给回信中的一段话，怎么提交修改稿啊，是提交一个改后的手稿和一封
已经有7人回复
- 大家看看我这cv图怎么回事，这么奇怪
已经有7人回复
- 论文被拒稿，想发信给主编申诉，不知道申诉信该怎么写？
已经有8人回复
- 论文返修后被拒，求帮忙看看拒信
已经有27人回复
- 投Energy &Fuels 编辑的拒信，大家看看还有戏吗？
已经有7人回复
- JMCC投稿编辑回信，大家帮小弟看看还有没有机会？
已经有5人回复
- 一篇国外SCI在Under Review了3个多月后,发信问了下,编辑的回复,大家帮我看看
已经有11人回复
- 国外学校国际部发的信，大家看看什么意思。
已经有3人回复
- 被拒了，想申诉呢，大家帮忙看看拒稿信，还有没有可能？
已经有13人回复
- PRL编辑拒稿信，请大家看看还有申诉必要吗
已经有9人回复
- 紧急！收到校稿信，请大家帮我看看，谢谢。
已经有15人回复
- 大家写催稿信都直接发编辑邮箱还是通过投稿系统？
已经有6人回复
- 投稿被拒了，不甘心想写信给编辑，大家帮我看下该怎么写？
已经有10人回复
- 帮忙看看APL的拒信，重投还有希望吗？
已经有16人回复
- 大家看看编辑对我催稿信的回复，不知还要多久才能审完？
已经有16人回复
mzbetter
主管区长
顺其自然
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3576.6
- 散金: 2699
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 624
- 在线: 163.2小时
- 虫号: 2657218
- 注册: 2013-09-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 环境微生物学
5楼2016-10-23 22:26:10
一字
兑换贵宾
寻找阳光
- 应助: 25 (小学生)
- 金币: 4360.5
- 散金: 88
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 572
- 在线: 236.1小时
- 虫号: 1060714
- 注册: 2010-07-19
- 专业: 通信理论与系统
2楼2014-04-24 08:49:53
F_Shaw
新虫
- 应助: 95 (初中生)
- 金币: 1745.8
- 散金: 925
- 红花: 53
- 帖子: 1256
- 在线: 357.7小时
- 虫号: 1257528
- 注册: 2011-04-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
3楼2014-04-24 08:53:42
4楼2014-04-24 10:28:35
