| 查看: 4757 | 回复: 28 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
论文小修之后又变成了under review，好焦急的说 已有17人参与
|
|||
|
这是一审时，审稿人的意见， Ref.: Ms. No. EPJP-D-14-00013 A Study on Oscillating Second Kind Boundary Condition for Pennes Equation Considering Thermal Relaxation. The European Physical Journal - Plus Dear Dr. zhu, Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided link. When revising your work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Your revision is due by 01-04-2014. To submit a revision, go to http://epjp.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called 'Submissions Needing Revision'. You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely Paolo Biscari Associate Editor The European Physical Journal - Plus Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: In their paper, authors study the effects of the thermal relaxation, the blood perfusion and the oscillating of ambient heat flux on the living tissue temperature through a 1D Cattaneo-Vernott (CV) model for Pennes' bioheat transfer equation under oscillating second kind boundary condition. They showed that the tissue temperature oscillates in the same period with the ambient heat flow. Investigating the of blood perfusion on the temperature, they obtained, in a special case, that the mean value of excess temperature will reach a steady-state. They have also discussed the effect of relaxation time τ_{q} on the steady-state temperature. The theme discussed in the manuscript is interesting althought the author have limited themselves in the linear case of CV model. The manuscript can then be published in the EPJ-Plus after the authors gave appropriate answers to the below critics. 1. What is the mean of the abbreviation CV which appears in the abstract (it probably stands for Cattaneo and Vernott)? 2. Second line of page 2, authors must correct the world Penes which probably stands for Pennes. 3. In the second line after Eq (2), it should be b etter to write: τ_{q} ranges from 10⁻¹⁴ to 10⁻⁸ s. 4. May the authors explain why they stat that the CV model of bioheat transfer is very important (see end of page 2)? 5. May the authors accurately explain why the insertion of Eq. (2) into Eq. (1) gives Eq. (3)? 6. I cannot see why after multiplying both sides of Eq. (4) by k, authors have obtained Eq. (10)! Eq. (10) is valid only when k is constant. 7. Θ introduced after Eq. (12) is not defined 3.4日通知小修，16日（周日）晚我将修改稿返回，17日我的稿件又变成了under review,好焦急的说。 修了两次，已经accepted了！从去年12.28日投稿到今年4.15日文章接收，历时3个月零19天，刨除西方人元旦休息，共历时3个月零12天。 [ Last edited by zwp781229 on 2014-4-18 at 15:51 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
怎么看青基中了没有啊
已经有6人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有3人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有19人回复
-
基金未中，这种答复是模板吗？
已经有7人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 有没有遇到Applied Optics 小修意见 提交后 又repeat review的情况？
已经有9人回复
- 小修之后又under review十天了，好崩溃啊，难到是赶上了放假月么？
已经有5人回复
- 小修后已经两个月了还在under review, 需要催一下么
已经有7人回复
- 暂时接受（小修）后半个月了，怎么还是under review
已经有3人回复
- plos one修回投稿过程中最后building PDF出现问题，急求啊！！
已经有7人回复
- Nanoscale小修后结果焦急等待中
已经有80人回复
- 文章先大修，后又小修，小修后现在状态under review八天了！
已经有14人回复
- 小修，只有1个审稿人的意见，返回后又under review了，诡异的日期居然会改变？
已经有17人回复
- 小修后再次under review，不知道要多久，千万别被拒了
已经有9人回复
- SCI小修后2个半月了还处于UNDER REVIEW状态
已经有13人回复
- MSE A 小修 with editor 14天后变成under review，请问是什么情况啊？焦急与担心中
已经有5人回复
- 有没有投Letters in applied microbiology小修后还under review两个周没结果的
已经有10人回复
- 一审小修,投稿2月后稿件状态从require reviews completed到under review?
已经有13人回复
- 论文小修，under review一个月，正常否？
已经有20人回复
- 小修后还要under review?要不要担心？
已经有18人回复
- 小修稿上传3个多月了，状态还是under review,催稿编辑也没反应，怎么办啊
已经有9人回复
- 文章小修，返修后一个半月还under review怎么写信给编辑？
已经有24人回复
- 小修稿上传50天了还是under review，要不要催一下
已经有14人回复
- 大家小修后都under review 几回啊？
已经有15人回复
- 小修后7个星期还在under review
已经有8人回复
8楼2014-03-20 15:30:36
yijianmeixyt
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
一剪梅
- 应助: 158 (高中生)
- 金币: 16506.5
- 散金: 59
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 1880
- 在线: 304.6小时
- 虫号: 1161506
- 注册: 2010-12-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 机构学与机器人
2楼2014-03-20 11:42:34
3楼2014-03-20 11:44:59
幼麟儿
木虫 (著名写手)
硕士
- 应助: 33 (小学生)
- 金币: 1598.8
- 散金: 774
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1023
- 在线: 268.1小时
- 虫号: 2082413
- 注册: 2012-10-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 通信理论与系统
4楼2014-03-20 14:05:48
