24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zwp781229

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 61.1
帖子: 67
在线: 31.7小时
虫号: 1868442
注册: 2012-06-24
专业: 流体力学

[交流] 论文小修之后又变成了under review，好焦急的说已有17人参与

这是一审时，审稿人的意见，

Ref.: Ms. No. EPJP-D-14-00013
A Study on Oscillating Second Kind Boundary Condition for Pennes Equation Considering Thermal Relaxation.
The European Physical Journal - Plus

Dear Dr. zhu,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

The reviewers' comments can be found at the end of this email or can be accessed by following the provided link.

When revising your work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

Your revision is due by 01-04-2014.

To submit a revision, go to http://epjp.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called 'Submissions Needing Revision'. You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely

Paolo Biscari
Associate Editor
The European Physical Journal - Plus

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: In their paper, authors study the effects of the thermal relaxation, the blood perfusion and the oscillating of ambient heat flux on the living tissue temperature through a 1D Cattaneo-Vernott (CV) model for Pennes' bioheat transfer equation under oscillating second kind boundary condition. They showed that the tissue temperature oscillates in the same period with the ambient heat flow. Investigating the of blood perfusion on the temperature, they obtained, in a special case, that the mean value of excess temperature will reach a steady-state. They have also discussed the effect of relaxation time τ_{q} on the steady-state temperature.
The theme discussed in the manuscript is interesting althought the author have limited themselves in the linear case of CV model. The manuscript can then be published in the EPJ-Plus after the authors gave appropriate answers to the below critics.
1. What is the mean of the abbreviation CV which appears in the abstract (it probably stands for Cattaneo and Vernott)?
2. Second line of page 2, authors must correct the world Penes which probably stands for Pennes.
3. In the second line after Eq (2), it should be b etter to write: τ_{q} ranges from 10⁻¹⁴ to 10⁻⁸ s.
4. May the authors explain why they stat that the CV model of bioheat transfer is very important (see end of page 2)?
5. May the authors accurately explain why the insertion of Eq. (2) into Eq. (1) gives Eq. (3)?
6. I cannot see why after multiplying both sides of Eq. (4) by k, authors have obtained Eq. (10)! Eq. (10) is valid only when k is constant.
7. Θ introduced after Eq. (12) is not defined

3.4日通知小修，16日（周日）晚我将修改稿返回，17日我的稿件又变成了under review,好焦急的说。

修了两次，已经accepted了！从去年12.28日投稿到今年4.15日文章接收，历时3个月零19天，刨除西方人元旦休息，共历时3个月零12天。

[ Last edited by zwp781229 on 2014-4-18 at 15:51 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有6人回复
三无产品还有机会吗已经有5人回复
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗已经有7人回复
压汞仪和BET测气凝胶孔隙率已经有4人回复
博士申请都是内定的吗？已经有14人回复
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行” 已经有13人回复
氨基封端PDMS和HDI反应快速固化已经有11人回复
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？已经有11人回复
论文投稿求助已经有4人回复
Applied Surface Science 这个期刊。有哪位虫友投过的能把word模板发给我参考一下嘛已经有3人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

有没有遇到Applied Optics 小修意见提交后又repeat review的情况？已经有9人回复
小修之后又under review十天了，好崩溃啊，难到是赶上了放假月么？已经有5人回复
小修后已经两个月了还在under review, 需要催一下么已经有7人回复
暂时接受（小修）后半个月了，怎么还是under review 已经有3人回复
plos one修回投稿过程中最后building PDF出现问题，急求啊！！已经有7人回复
Nanoscale小修后结果焦急等待中已经有80人回复
文章先大修，后又小修，小修后现在状态under review八天了！已经有14人回复
小修，只有1个审稿人的意见，返回后又under review了，诡异的日期居然会改变？已经有17人回复
小修后再次under review，不知道要多久，千万别被拒了已经有9人回复
SCI小修后2个半月了还处于UNDER REVIEW状态已经有13人回复
MSE A 小修 with editor 14天后变成under review，请问是什么情况啊？焦急与担心中已经有5人回复
有没有投Letters in applied microbiology小修后还under review两个周没结果的已经有10人回复
一审小修,投稿2月后稿件状态从require reviews completed到under review? 已经有13人回复
论文小修，under review一个月，正常否？已经有20人回复
小修后还要under review?要不要担心？已经有18人回复
小修稿上传3个多月了，状态还是under review,催稿编辑也没反应，怎么办啊已经有9人回复
文章小修，返修后一个半月还under review怎么写信给编辑？已经有24人回复
小修稿上传50天了还是under review，要不要催一下已经有14人回复
大家小修后都under review 几回啊？已经有15人回复
小修后7个星期还在under review 已经有8人回复

1楼2014-03-20 11:37:42

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

zwp781229

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 61.1
帖子: 67
在线: 31.7小时
虫号: 1868442
注册: 2012-06-24
专业: 流体力学

引用回帖:

4楼: Originally posted by 幼麟儿 at 2014-03-20 14:05:48
你确定7个问题还是小修么？祝福楼主哈哈，俺也在焦急的等待结果。

所谓七个问题连拼写错误Pennes写成了Penes，写法习惯问题“ranges form 10^-8 to 10^-14s”改成"ranges from 10^-14 to 10^-8s"等都有；还有一个模型，文中解释了，但摘要中出现时没解释都提出来了。还有一处是进行拉普拉斯变换的时候，忘了说\Theta就是\theta的像了。。。还有一处忘了写前提条件传热系数k是个常数了。。。