24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3201  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

神之舞

木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] Energy & Environmental Science三个审稿人都同意,但说方法不适合申诉有戏吗?已有10人参与

各位大神,最近投了Energy & Environmental Science,意见返回后,三个审稿人都同意,差不多是小修,但其中一个说方法不适合EES风格,最后编辑要我转投到Catalysis Science & Technology,请问申诉有戏吗?
回复此楼
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

神之舞

木虫 (正式写手)

Thank you for your email below, I am sorry to hear that you are unhappy with the decision to transfer your manuscript to Catalysis Science and Technology.

However, unfortunately I cannot grant you appeal for the following reasons. As stated by all of the referees, this manuscript reports a facile synthesis route for the production of nanosized ZSM-5, although zeolites are used widely in energy and environmental fields, methods to synthesize these materials does not fit into the scope of the journal.

I can see that the route that you have discovered is much better than the current method used and will be extremely beneficial to researchers in the field of catalysis synthesis. However, I do not feel that the research reported in this manuscript will appeal to the broad readership associated to EES and would find its audience in a catalysis related journal. Therefore I would like to encourage you to transfer your work to Catalysis Science and Technology and I feel that the work would be much better suited to audience of this journal.
14楼2014-03-18 13:12:06
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 17 个回答

bnutemp

木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
神之舞: 金币+5, ★★★★★最佳答案 2014-03-18 12:04:50
这差距也太大了吧,偶觉得还是申诉,应该有戏的。
2楼2014-03-18 09:40:30
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaomijuan

新虫 (初入文坛)

楼主,我是来问什么是小修,什么是大修,怎么判断呢
3楼2014-03-18 09:47:43
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

神之舞

木虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by xiaomijuan at 2014-03-18 09:47:43
楼主,我是来问什么是小修,什么是大修,怎么判断呢

就是提的问题很好回答,不用加实验,问题很少,大修应该是改动很大吧
4楼2014-03-18 09:52:16
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见