24小时热门版块排行榜

南方科技大学公共卫生及应急管理学院2025级博士研究生招生报考通知

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

cixindegu

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 1713.9
帖子: 145
在线: 180.6小时
虫号: 1835740
注册: 2012-05-26
性别: GG
专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功

[求助] 投了篇美陶，3个月后返回，审稿意见让我很尴尬，求指点。。。已有6人参与

12月份投了美陶，等了3个月，等到了大修，满怀激动的点开view decision letter ，看了审稿人的意见，感觉都很简单，结果再往下拉，看到了Associate Editor Comments to Author:，第一行我心就凉了一大截：The reviewers of the paper have called for major/minor revision of the paper. In the present state, I cannot recommend the publication of the paper even if the authors address all the concerns of the reviewers.
   接下来就是对我整个文章所有章节的否定，其中，包括理论性的东西，全部否定。。。（这些理论不是我提的，是我参考别人文献来解释现象的）。我一下子就懵了，回头看了看意见，的确是大修，不是拒稿。感觉去看看主编的意见：Both reviewers have found potential for publication, but also find need of revisions to your manuscript. The Associate Editor makes comment, feels the manuscript in the present form does not meet Journal standards, and recommends that the manuscript be reconsidered for publication after major revisions, including new information, are made. The comments of the reviewers and Associate Editor make a compelling case and I concur with the Associate Editor recommendation. The manuscript will be reconsidered for publication after major revisions are made. I ask that you respond to the comments of the review team and modify the manuscript. You must submit your response to each comment of the review team indicating how you have modified the manuscript or why you have not when you submit your revised manuscript as described below. Please note that your paper can still be rejected after resubmission if you do not satisfy the review team criticisms.
   看完我就凌乱了，如果不理Associate Editor Comments to Author的意见感觉必然被拒。如果要我接受他的意见，就是完全重写。。。
   现在我不知道该怎么办了，因为导师不是做这方面的，也不是特别的懂，只能全靠自己，求虫友们帮忙提点意见啊~