24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

冰蓝水蜜桃19

银虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 400.5
帖子: 49
在线: 16小时
虫号: 2692963
注册: 2013-09-30
专业: 化学反应工程

[求助] 给编辑回信已有5人参与

各位虫友们，最近投了一篇文章，初审时两位审稿人都很中肯，一个审稿人说小修，提了四个问题，另一位说是修改后可以接受，提了九个问题，他们两位提的问题也都比较好回答，但是我按要求修改后，编辑直接给拒了，也没说什么理由，我想给编辑写一份信，争取一下。可以吗，应该怎么说比较好，下面是两位审稿人初审时的评价以及被拒时编辑的回信。

Reviewer #1:
In this work highly dispersed mesoporous MnOx-CeO2 hollow nanospheres were prepared by surfactant assisted supercritical anti-solvent technique for the first time. It is very interesting, as authors conclude; the prepared nanoparticles have not only higher specific areas, more uniform pores and larger pore volumes, but also richer surface active oxygen species and higher oxygen mobility contributing to higher catalytic activity compared with that fabricated without surfactants.
The work is well elaborated and its format is adequate. The main objective is clearly specified and the methodology and results are well presented. However, some points must be improved, which are considered as minor revision, as following:
Minor revisions
1) More details should be given by the authors about the phase equilibrium analysis.
2)    Although the equipment have been described in the previous publication of the authors, it is better to state again more details of the equipment as the accuracies for temperature and pressure measurements.
3) If it is possible it would be nice including the figures that show the temperature and pressure effects
4) Authors should revise the tables to correct any mistakes in the nomenclature: no space between "size" and "(" in Table 1; decide how many decimal is going to be used…
Reviewer #2: The authors prepared highly dispersed mesoporous MnOx-CeO2 hollow nanospheres by supercritical anti-solvent technique (SAS) with the aid of suitable surfactants. The materials were characterized by different techniques, and the catalytic activity of the nanospheres for low temperature deNOx with NH3 was tested. I think the manuscript is acceptable after revision.

1. For the abbreviations that are not very commonly used, such as PVP, P123, and reNOx, the full names should be provided when they appear for the first time.
2. In the Graphical Abstract, MnOx-CeO2 should be included, so that the readers can know MnOx-CeO2 particles are synthesized.
3. In Introduction, why there is the sentence " In addition, non-nitrate salt will be used as precursor, which can decrease the environmental impact of catalyst preparation in the long term." . It may make readers confusing. Are all other methods using nitrate salts?
4. In Figure 3, the number of the particles in a, b, and c are not enough. The images with more  particles should be provided.
5. It should be noted that PEG-6000 is usually not classified as a surfactant.
6. The page volume and page number of the Ref. 16 should be provided.
7. The paper is too long. Some Figures and Tables can be given as Supporting Information.
8. In the x-axis of Figures 1 and 2, the unit is the molar ratio of CO2: methanol. Please make sure that is correct.
9. The mechanism for the surfactant to prevent the aggregation of the particles should be discussed based on the interaction between the surfactant and the surface of the particles.
10. The language should be polished, and there are some minor mistakes. Please checked carefully.

这是编辑拒稿时的回信
  I have studied the revisions of the manuscript made by the authors.  Unfortunately, my conclusions are that the revisions made are of insufficient quality to allow further processing of the work. The decision on the manuscript is that it is unsuitable for publication in this journal.

As a note to the authors, the topic is of interest to readers in this journal and could be considered in a future submission provided that the quality of the English, text, discussion and presentation are substantially improved.

回复此楼