| 查看: 3935 | 回复: 16 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
95370445木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
论文评审有个奇怪的意见 已有8人参与
|
|
|
有个评审人给的意见： The paper presents a 3-step methodology to obtain ******. The authors are trying to sell this as a "new method". In fact, I would argue that none of the three steps is new, but rather taken from the literature. What is new is the combination of the three steps into a strategy that indeed yields some novelty, and, as the experiments show, also some value. I would caution the authors, however, not to oversell their methodology. It is a neat but rather incremental idea that appears to work relatively well for *** of rather limited extent and complexity. Nothing more, nothing less. 我不太明白的是：用或者整合现有的其他研究方法去实现某个科研目的，这种形式不是也可以成为新方法吗？请教高手应该如何应对？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造课题组 2027级博士研究生招生
已经有5人回复
-
课题组招2027级博士 上海工程技术大学 激光智能制造方向
已经有5人回复
-
有机合成以后会不会被AI改变？做科研的虫友怎么看
已经有8人回复
-
求合成方法
已经有7人回复
-
现代”学阀”该如何界定
已经有12人回复
-
我的奶奶
已经有3人回复
17楼2014-02-28 11:05:50
2楼2014-02-25 22:29:14
3楼2014-02-25 22:30:13
95370445
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 10 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5726.4
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 135
- 在线: 288.1小时
- 虫号: 1879912
- 注册: 2012-07-05
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 测量与地图学
4楼2014-02-25 22:34:49