24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

smallfolk

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 92 (初中生)
金币: 657.2
帖子: 698
在线: 597.7小时
虫号: 442827

[交流] chem comm投稿11天后，直接被编辑拒掉了。只好年后再战了。

Thank you for your submission to ChemComm, which I have read with interest. I regret to inform you however that this manuscript will not be considered further as a submission to the journal. All manuscripts submitted to ChemComm are initially evaluated by the Editors to ensure they meet the essential criteria for publication in the journal. I’m sorry to say that on this occasion your article will undergo no further processing because it is not of sufficient urgency and impact to appeal to our wide readership.

Papers published in ChemComm should report preliminary accounts of original and significant research that will appeal to a wide general readership or be of great interest to the specialist. The rejection rate for papers submitted to ChemComm is ~70%. Further information regarding our policy on the initial assessment of submissions can be found on our website at http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/Jo ... ssessment/index.asp
对照了一下，
A manuscript may be returned to the author(s) without external review if, in the opinion of the Editor, the manuscript falls into one or more of the following categories:

•the manuscript clearly falls outside the scope of the journal;
•the work is of poor scientific quality such that it is clearly not suitable for publication in a top-tier scientific journal;
•the manuscript is of insufficient general interest for the journal and would be better suited to a more specialised journal;
•the novelty of the work falls below that required for the journal;
•the manuscript represents undue fragmentation of the research into multiple papers;
•the manuscript contains redundant information or significant amounts of material that has already been published elsewhere or is under consideration by another journal;
•the quality of the English in the manuscript is so poor as to render the science presented unclear;
•the manuscript has already been reviewed and rejected by a different RSC journal, and the author(s) have made little or no attempt to address the advice of the Editor and/or referees already given;
•the conclusions drawn by the manuscript are well known or have been previously published.

貌似是编辑觉得应该投更专业的期刊。
不过我有个疑问，会不会因为不好意思直说写的太烂，而委婉地以文中所说的原因拒掉啊？
如之奈何？换个专业期刊试试？求意见！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

垃圾破二本职称评审标准已经有19人回复
职称评审没过，求安慰已经有53人回复
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦已经有5人回复
26申博自荐已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿已经有4人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

文章接收，但又有“address the Comments to Author before......" 已经有7人回复
论文第一次修改返回后2个月未回，要不要催一下啊，最近刚给论文通讯作者发论文让审稿已经有12人回复
投Advanced Materials 10天后，投稿系统中所有信息都没有了已经有8人回复
Green chem 被拒，编辑推荐RSC advances 已经有8人回复
请高手指教一下，INT J QUANTUM CHEM和J PHYS ORG CHEM这两本杂志怎么样？已经有7人回复
一篇关于水牛酸奶的论文该投什么杂志呢已经有5人回复
石墨烯，分子印迹类的稿容易中什么杂志？已经有8人回复
RSC投稿状态求助已经有19人回复
小修没有完全回答审稿人意见，会不会悲剧啊？已经有21人回复
ChemComm被拒，该投什么样的杂志？已经有10人回复
ACS旗下的Inorganic Chemistry一般多久能送审呢已经有11人回复
【有奖活动】我的投稿经历(活动已更新) 已经有17人回复
Pnas "under editorial board review" 状态要持续多长时间? 已经有14人回复
wiley的状态一直显示“submitted” 已经有11人回复
RSC新出期刊《Chemical Science》已经有13人回复
J.Am.Ceram.Soc投稿中Under review&Awaiting EIC Immediate Decision 什么意思？已经有17人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2014-01-29 22:10:03

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

smallfolk

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 92 (初中生)
金币: 657.2
帖子: 698
在线: 597.7小时
虫号: 442827

引用回帖:

38楼: Originally posted by 绍敏郡主 at 2014-01-29 23:38:28
论文创新性如何？
如果你创新性确实还不错的话，那可能是你的cover letter写的不够好。
cover letter最重要的作用就是让编辑看到你论文的创新性和重要性，说服编辑送审。

自己觉得创新性还挺好的。所以审稿人都建议的是业内的大牛。但都是自认为，不过被编辑干掉有些不爽。introduction是收着在写，当时就担心这一点，cover letter写的有些略保守，没有说出拔高工作的意义。看来大概率是没引起编辑的兴趣。只好换个专业期刊试试了。祝新年快乐。

[ 发自手机版 http://muchong.com/3g ]